Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.1K
Clustering drives cooperation on reputation networks, all else fixed
1Trinity College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BH, UK.
Royal Society Open Science
|May 1, 2023
Summary
Cooperation in social networks is driven by reputation. This study shows that network clustering, not size or connections, is key to fostering trust and cooperation.
Area of Science:
- Social network analysis
- Game theory
- Computational sociology
Background:
- Reputation systems are crucial for cooperation in social networks.
- Understanding the link between network structure and social trust is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the causal mechanism between graph properties and reputation-based cooperation.
- To make complex network dynamics accessible to a broader scientific audience.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a simplified mathematical model.
- Analyzed social networks with fixed size and degree.
Main Results:
- The clustering coefficient was identified as the primary driver of cooperation levels.
- Differences in cooperation were explained by variations in network clustering.
Conclusions:
- Network clustering significantly influences the emergence of cooperation and social trust.
- The findings provide a foundational understanding of cooperation dynamics in social networks.
Related Concept Videos
Social Exchange Theory
34.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.6K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Relationship Formation
40.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.2K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
380
Affiliation motivation is the intrinsic desire to connect with others and belong to a social group, which plays a crucial role in forming and maintaining personal relationships. This type of motivation is essential for psychological well-being, as it provides individuals with a sense of community and support. An example of this is a student who joins a study group in order to feel a sense of connection. People with high affiliation motivation actively seek social approval, take satisfaction in...
380
Group Polarization
34.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.4K

