Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Large breasts, small breasts; which mammographic technic?].

C Hessler, C Depeursinge, M Grecescu

    Journal De Radiologie
    |February 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Genetic relationships and introgression events between wild and cultivated grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.): focus on Italian Lambruscos.

    Scientific reports·2024
    Same author

    Production and separation of positron emitters for hadron therapy at FRS-Cave M.

    Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms·2023
    Same author

    Melanoma in children and adolescents: analysis of susceptibility genes in 123 Italian patients.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2021
    Same author

    Acute and intermediate toxicity of 3-week radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost using TomoDirect: prospective series of 287 early breast cancer patients.

    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico·2021
    Same author

    Association of quantitative MRI-based radiomic features with prognostic factors and recurrence rate in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

    Neoplasma·2020
    Same author

    MC1R variants in relation to naevi in melanoma cases and controls: a pooled analysis from the M-SKIP project.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
    Same journal

    [Not Available].

    Journal de radiologie·2014
    Same journal

    [Not Available].

    Journal de radiologie·2014
    Same journal

    [Not Available].

    Journal de radiologie·2014
    Same journal

    [Not Available].

    Journal de radiologie·2014
    Same journal

    [Not Available].

    Journal de radiologie·2014
    Same journal

    [Not Available].

    Journal de radiologie·2014
    See all related articles

    Optimizing mammography voltage is key for balancing image quality and patient risk. This study found specific optimal voltages for different breast thicknesses, highlighting limitations in current automatic exposure devices for dose and quality management.

    Area of Science:

    • Radiological Physics
    • Medical Imaging
    • Breast Cancer Screening

    Background:

    • Mammography utilizes X-ray imaging to detect breast cancer, with dose and image quality being critical parameters.
    • Breast thickness significantly influences radiation dose and image quality, necessitating optimized imaging protocols.
    • Current automatic exposure devices (AEDs) may not adequately compensate for variations in breast thickness.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of varying voltage (25-33 kV) on dose and image quality in mammography.
    • To determine optimal voltage settings for different breast thicknesses (thin, average, thick) to balance risk and image quality.
    • To evaluate the suitability of surface and midplane doses as risk indicators in variable breast thicknesses.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Utilized three mammographic phantoms simulating thin, average, and thick breasts.
    • Evaluated global image quality using an objective image quality index.
    • Selected average glandular dose as the primary indicator of patient risk.

    Main Results:

    • Surface and midplane doses are unreliable risk indicators for variable breast thicknesses.
    • Increased voltage led to decreased average glandular dose, with a relatively minor impact on image quality.
    • Optimal voltage ranges were identified: 28-29 kV for thin, 29-30 kV for average, and 33-35 kV for thick breasts.

    Conclusions:

    • Specific voltage optimization is crucial for effective mammographic screening across diverse breast densities.
    • The findings suggest that current AEDs require improvement to handle breast thickness variations effectively.
    • Further research into advanced imaging techniques and dose reduction strategies is warranted for mammography.