Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025
05:48
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
5.8K
Practical Reasoning and Practical Argumentation: A Stakeholder Commitment Approach.
Kees van Berkel1, Jean H M Wagemans2
1Institute for Philosophy II, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Topoi : an International Review of Philosophy
|May 1, 2023
Summary
This study explores practical reasoning (PR) and practical argumentation (PA), introducing the Stakeholder Commitment Approach (SCA) to unify these fields. The SCA clarifies commitments, enhancing our understanding of practical deliberation.
Area of Science:
- Philosophy
- Cognitive Science
- Decision Sciences
Background:
- Practical Reasoning (PR) and Practical Argumentation (PA) are distinct yet related fields.
- Existing models of practical deliberation lack a unified framework.
- Conceptual and terminological overlaps between PR and PA require clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the overlap between PR and PA theories.
- To develop a novel approach to practical deliberation.
- To refine the criteria for labeling reasoning and argumentation as 'practical'.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of volitional, epistemic, normative, and social commitments.
- Delineation of rationales for 'practical' labels in reasoning and argumentation.
- Development of the Stakeholder Commitment Approach (SCA).
Main Results:
- Identified significant conceptual and terminological overlap between PR and PA.
- Proposed the SCA, distinguishing 'problem holders' and 'problem solvers'.
- Specified commitment distributions among stakeholders within the SCA framework.
Conclusions:
- The SCA unifies PR and PA by refining the grounds for 'practical' labels.
- The new approach enhances understanding of practical deliberation by clarifying stakeholder commitments.
- This work bridges the gap between practical reasoning and argumentation theories.
Keywords:
CommitmentsDeliberationPractical argumentation (PA)Practical reasoning (PR)Stakeholder commitment approach (SCA)More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.6K
01:52Persuasion Strategies
38.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.8K
01:30Ethical Dilemmas II
1.2K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.2K
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
02:20Routes of Persuasion
64.2K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
64.2K
01:19Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
96
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
96