Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in the Rat Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry
Published on: January 19, 2020
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review
Rachel Heutz1, Jurgen Claassen1,2, Sanne Feiner1
1Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Insights
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) appears preserved in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This meta-analysis found no significant differences in dCA efficiency between these groups and healthy controls.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) maintains stable cerebral blood flow (CBF) against blood pressure (BP) variations.
- Impaired dCA is linked to cerebrovascular damage and altered responses to antihypertensive medications.
- Existing literature presents conflicting findings on dCA status in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Conclusions:
- Current evidence does not support the hypothesis of impaired dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment.
- Further research is warranted to investigate dCA in dementia, particularly using induced BP fluctuations while controlling for end-tidal carbon dioxide levels.
Abstract:
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) is a key mechanism that regulates cerebral blood flow (CBF) in response to transient changes in blood pressure (BP). Impairment of dCA could increase vulnerability to hypertensive vascular damage, but also to BP lowering effects of antihypertensive treatment. The literature remains conflicted on whether dCA is altered in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We summarized available data on dCA in AD and MCI, by searching PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases (inception-January 2022). Eight studies (total n = 443) were included in the qualitative synthesis of which seven were eligible for meta-analysis. All studies used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and transfer function analysis or the autoregulatory index to assess dCA during spontaneous or induced BP fluctuations. Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between AD, MCI and healthy controls in dCA parameters for spontaneous fluctuations. For induced fluctuations, the available data were limited, but indicative of at least preserved and possibly better autoregulatory functioning in AD and MCI compared to controls. In summary, current evidence does not suggest poorer dCA efficiency in AD or MCI. Further work is needed to investigate dCA in dementia with induced fluctuations controlling for changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Neural Regulation
Autoregulation of Blood Flow
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation....

