Differences in angular kinematics when using thigh, implant, or medial knee markers in osseointegrated transfemoral...

The Helen Hayes anatomical model is commonly used in clinical gait analysis with standard medial/lateral knee and thigh markers.

To quantify soft-tissue artifacts associated with the thigh marker following osseointegration surgery, we added an "implant marker" on the implant extending from the femur, with the objective of identifying the differences in the angular kinematics when using the standard versus implant marker. One female adult with an osseointegrated transfemoral prosthesis walked overground for three trials, and common kinematic measures were calculated from motion capture data.

The results indicated that, when using the thigh marker, a peak of knee varus occurred during the swing phase on the prosthetic side, which is unusual during gait and not feasible for hinge joint prostheses. When using the implant marker, knee varus/valgus was closer to normative. Using the thigh marker, the results showed an internal hip rotation at the start of stance and during the mid and terminal swing phases. In contrast, external hip rotation occurred in both stance and swing phases using the implant marker. Moreover, when selecting the medial knee marker instead of the thigh marker, the angular kinematics and range of motion of knee varus/valgus and hip rotation were comparable to those for the implant marker.

This finding suggests that when studying osseointegration gait, using an implant marker will result in more accurate femoral and knee joint motion than using the thigh marker. Changing the selection of markers can reduce the errors of knee varus/valgus and hip kinematics in osseointegrated transfemoral prosthetic gait.