Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025
Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair
Published on: November 12, 2021
Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
Ahmed Halouani1, Kaouther Dimassi1, Amine Ben Mansour2
1Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia (Drs Halouani, Dimassi, and Triki).
Background:
Uterine closure technique can affect scar healing, potentially resulting in unfavorable gynecologic and life-threatening obstetrical outcomes. Double-layer continuous unlocked suture has been demonstrated to promote optimal residual myometrial thickness. Recently, the purse-string uterine suture technique has emerged as a viable method to enhance the healing of scars. However, the current lack of randomized trials assessing the relevance of this technique warrants further investigation.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of purse-string uterine sutures on scar healing after cesarean delivery when compared with double-layer continuous unlocked suture.
Study Design:
This was a randomized controlled trial; 126 patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing primary cesarean delivery were enrolled in 2 groups. The primary outcome was the mean residual myometrial thickness measured by saline infusion sonography 6 months after surgery by 2 sonographers blinded to uterine closure techniques. Operative time, calculated blood loss, total number of needed threads, and perioperative scar width were used for the perioperative analysis. Healing ratio and cesarean scar defect measurements were used for the 6-month analysis.
Results:
There was no significant difference in terms of residual myometrial thickness (9.38±2.3 vs 8.4±3.9 mm; P=.187), blood loss (540 [146-982] vs 495 [241-903] mL; P=.815), or operative time (6.2 [5.2-7] vs 6 [5.3-7] minutes; P=.977). Achievement of purse-string uterine suture required significantly fewer threads (1 [1-1] vs 2 [1-2]; P<.001) and fewer hemostatic complementary sutures (1 [1-1] vs 1 [1-2]; P=.013). Scar width was significantly lower with purse-string uterine sutures (50 [40.5-50.5] vs 70 [60-70.5] mm; P<.0001). Purse-string uterine sutures allowed a higher healing ratio (1 [0.9-1] vs 0.84 [0.59-1]; P=.003) and significantly fewer cesarean scar defects (12% vs 35%; P=.018) compared with double-layer continuous unlocked suture.
Conclusion:
Despite resulting in no difference in residual myometrial thickness, purse-string uterine closure seems to be associated with better uterine scar healing on the basis of a higher healing ratio, and a lower rate of cesarean scar defects compared with double-layer continuous unlocked suture.
