Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Robust Ligature-Induced Model of Murine Periodontitis for the Evaluation of Oral Neutrophils
Published on: January 21, 2020
Confounding in observational studies evaluating the association between Alzheimer's disease and periodontal disease:
Gustavo G Nascimento1,2, Fábio R M Leite1,2, Caio Melo Mesquita3
1National Dental Research Institute Singapore, National Dental Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Background:
Studies investigating the association between periodontitis and Alzheimer's disease (AD) suggested indirect (periodontitis would increase the circulation of inflammation-inducible molecules) and direct (periodontopathogens might colonize brains affected by Alzheimer's disease) pathways. While there seems to be a positive relationship between periodontitis and AD, concerns have been raised about the role of confounding.
Aim:
To systematically review the literature to assess confounding and their level of heterogeneity in the association between periodontitis and AD. Also, to examine data reporting and interpretation regarding confounding bias.
Methods:
This review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered within PROSPERO. Electronic searches were performed in seven main databases and three others to capture the "grey literature". The PECO strategy was used to identify observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort studies) assessing the association between periodontal disease and AD without restricting publication language and year. Critical appraisal was performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Confounders were evaluated following a two-step approach.
Results:
A total of 3255 studies were found, of which 18 (13 case-control, four cross-sectional, and one cohort) met the eligibility criteria. Participants with AD were 1399 (mean age 64 ± 9 to 84.8 ± 5.6 years), whereas those without AD were 1730 (mean age 62.6 ± 7.1 to 81.4 ± 4.6). Female patients composed most of the sample for both groups. The confounding variables "age" and "sex" were present in all studies. Four studies used the 2017 AAP/EFP periodontal classification. Most studies had a low risk of bias. Fifty percent of the articles did not consider confounding; variation in the adjustment approaches was observed. Additionally, 62% of the studies did not mention bias, and 40% did not discuss any limitations about confounders.
Conclusions:
Given the study's limitations, caution must be taken to properly interpret the association between periodontitis and AD.Registration: CRD42022293884.
Related Concept Videos
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

