Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
The Impact of Name Transformation on Match Rates Within a Large Consumer Database
Jonah Leshin1, Arjun Sanghvi1, Kavi Ravuri1
1Datavant, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract:
Accurate record linkage depends on the availability and quality of features such as first name and last name. Privacy preserving record linkage methods using tokenization is sensitive to perturbations in the patient features used as inputs. In this study we evaluated the impact of name transformations on the accuracy of patient matching using a large commercial dataset. We used a set of 68 million records representing 59 million unique individuals, and implemented and evaluated eight name transformation strategies, and generated precision, recall and F1 scores. Transforming names to include the most common nicknames resulted in a significant gain in recall while maintaining precision, and generated the highest F1 score compared with no name transformation (0.905 vs 0.807). Strategies tailored to transforming patient features can improve the precision and recall of patient matching, and make it possible to create high quality, linked datasets for research purposes.
More Related Videos
07:26Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases
Published on: March 19, 2018
09:20Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
Published on: February 23, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Relationship Formation
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test