Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Robbers Cave

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Author Correction: Sustained participation in a Payments for Ecosystem Services program reduces deforestation in a Mexican agricultural frontier.

Scientific reports·2024

Same author

Sustained participation in a Payments for Ecosystem Services program reduces deforestation in a Mexican agricultural frontier.

Scientific reports·2023

Same author

Large hydropower projects increase stress despite compensation efforts: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon.

PloS one·2023

Same author

Large-scale hydropower impacts and adaptation strategies on rural communities in the Amazonian floodplain of the Madeira River.

Journal of environmental management·2023

Same author

Feasibility of hybrid in-stream generator-photovoltaic systems for Amazonian off-grid communities.

PNAS nexus·2023

Same author

Advancing convergence research: Renewable energy solutions for off-grid communities.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Analyzing group communication dynamics and content in a common-pool resource experiment.

Patrick Hoffmann¹, Sergio Villamayor-Tomas¹, Maria Claudia Lopez²

¹Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.

|May 2, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Public communication in common-pool resource (CPR) management increases participant contributions and focuses discussions on collective action problems more than club communication. This informs natural resource governance strategies.

More Related Videos

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Area of Science:

Environmental Science
Behavioral Economics
Public Policy

Background:

Common-pool resources (CPRs) often require collective action and communication for sustainable management.
Participatory processes, crucial for CPR governance, can be structured as public or club goods.
Costly communication mechanisms influence participation and communication outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how two distinct costly communication structures (public vs. club good) affect participant contributions, payment dynamics, and communication content in CPR management.
To compare centralized (public) and networked (club) participatory processes in a lab-in-field experiment.
To provide empirical evidence for designing effective natural resource governance strategies.

Main Methods:

A lab-in-field experiment involving 100 real-life resource users.
Analysis of monetary contributions towards communication under public and club good conditions.
Examination of communication content and meeting participation patterns.

Main Results:

Contributions to communication were significantly higher when communication was provided as a public good.
Club communication resulted in more frequent but less inclusive meetings.
Communication content was more focused on addressing collective action problems in the public communication setting.

Conclusions:

The structure of costly communication significantly impacts participation and the effectiveness of addressing collective action problems in CPRs.
Publicly funded communication fosters greater inclusivity and a stronger focus on resource management challenges.
Findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and designers of natural resource governance systems.