Canonical Host-Pathogen Trade-Offs Subverted by Mutations with Dual Benefits

AbstractHost-parasite coevolution is expected to drive the evolution of genetic diversity because the traits used in arms races-namely, host range and parasite resistance-are hypothesized to trade off with traits used in resource competition. We therefore tested data for several trade-offs among 93 isolates of bacteriophage λ and 51 Escherichia coli genotypes that coevolved during a laboratory experiment. Surprisingly, we found multiple trade-ups (positive trait correlations) but little evidence of several canonical trade-offs. For example, some bacterial genotypes evaded a trade-off between phage resistance and absolute fitness, instead evolving simultaneous improvements in both traits. This was surprising because our experimental design was predicted to expose resistance-fitness trade-offs by culturing E. coli in a medium where the phage receptor, LamB, is also used for nutrient acquisition. On reflection, LamB mediates not one but many trade-offs, allowing for more complex trait interactions than just pairwise trade-offs. Here, we report that mathematical reasoning and laboratory data highlight how trade-ups should exist whenever an evolutionary system exhibits multiple interacting trade-offs. Does this mean that coevolution should not promote genetic diversity? No, quite the contrary. We deduce that whenever positive trait correlations are observed in multidimensional traits, other traits may trade off and so provide the right circumstances for diversity maintenance. Overall, this study reveals that there are predictive limits when data account only for pairwise trait correlations, and it argues that a wider range of circumstances than previously anticipated can promote genetic and species diversity.