Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Fully Automated Centrifugal Microfluidic Device for Ultrasensitive Protein Detection from Whole Blood
Published on: April 16, 2016
Taguchi method: artificial neural network approach for the optimization of high-efficiency microfluidic biosensor for
Imed Ben Romdhane1, Asma Jemmali1, Sameh Kaziz2,3
1Laboratory of Electronics and Microelectronics, Faculty of Science of Monastir, University of Monastir, 5019 Monastir, Tunisia.
Abstract:
COVID-19 is a pandemic disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This virus is mainly spread by droplets, respiratory secretions, and direct contact. Caused by the huge spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, research is focused on the study of biosensors as it presents a rapid solution for reducing incidents and fatality rates. In this paper, a microchip flow confinement method for the rapid transport of small sample volumes to sensor surfaces is optimized in terms of the confinement coefficient β, the position of the confinement flow X, and its inclination α relative to the main channel. A numerical simulation based on two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations has been used. Taguchi's L9(33) orthogonal array was adopted to design the numerical assays taking into account the confining flow parameters (α, β, and X) on the response time of microfluidic biosensors. Analyzing the signal-to-noise ratio allowed us to determine the most effective combinations of control parameters for reducing the response time. The contribution of the control factors to the detection time was determined via analysis of variance (ANOVA). Numerical predictive models using multiple linear regression (MLR) and an artificial neural network (ANN) were developed to accurately predict microfluidic biosensor response time. This study concludes that the best combination of control factors is that corresponds to , and X = 40 µm. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows that the position of the confinement channel (62% contribution) is the factor most responsible for the reduction in response time. Based on the correlation coefficient (R 2), and value adjustment factor (VAF), the ANN model performed better than the MLR model in terms of prediction accuracy.
More Related Videos
08:22Electrowetting-based Digital Microfluidics Platform for Automated Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Published on: February 23, 2020
09:58Computer Numerical Control Micromilling of a Microfluidic Acrylic Device with a Staggered Restriction for Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Immunoassays
Published on: June 23, 2022