Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

10.5K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
10.5K
Lagging Strand Synthesis01:59

Lagging Strand Synthesis

53.5K
During replication, the complementary strands in double-stranded DNA are synthesized at different rates. Replication first begins on the leading strand. Replication starts later, occurs more slowly, and proceeds discontinuously on the lagging strand.
There are several major differences between synthesis of the leading strand and synthesis of the lagging strand. 1) Leading strand synthesis happens in the direction of replication fork opening, whereas lagging strand synthesis happens in the...
53.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.6K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.6K
Replication in Eukaryotes02:31

Replication in Eukaryotes

171.0K
Overview
171.0K
Replication in Prokaryotes02:35

Replication in Prokaryotes

87.8K
Overview
87.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The OMERACT core domain sets for calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2026
Same author

Identifying candidate core domains for clinical trials in systemic sclerosis-associated Raynaud's phenomenon and digital ulcers.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2026
Same author

Suitability of the Oxford Shoulder Score for measuring pain in clinical trials evaluating interventions for people with shoulder disorders according to the OMERACT filter 2.2.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2026
Same author

Intersectoral interventions for people living with obesity: a scoping review and bibliometric analysis.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Workplace peer support for continuing professional development in occupational therapy: A grounded theory.

Australian occupational therapy journal·2026
Same author

Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Protocol: Effects of Organizational Transparency Interventions on Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Making and Human Decision-Makers: A Systematic Review of Enabling Mechanisms.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Reasons why Mothers Choose Human Milk as Their Method of Infant Nutrition: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review Protocol.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

PROTOCOL: Interventions Targeting Misinformation, Disinformation and Malinformation for Reducing and Countering Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Health and Social Care Interventions in the 80 years Old and Over Population: An Evidence and Gap Map.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

PROTOCOL: Utilisation of Genetics and Genomics in Primary Care: Protocol for an Evidence and Gap Map.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

PROTOCOL: How Do Primary Care Providers Seek Advice Regarding Paediatric Care? Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

PROTOCOL: When and how to replicate systematic reviews.

Sathya Karunananthan1, Lara J Maxwell2, Vivian Welch3

  • 1Clinical Epidemiology Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canada.

Campbell Systematic Reviews
|May 3, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This protocol outlines methods for replicating systematic reviews. It addresses when and how to conduct these crucial scientific replications to ensure research integrity.

More Related Videos

Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement
08:06

Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement

Published on: January 19, 2017

8.5K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

621

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K
Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement
08:06

Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement

Published on: January 19, 2017

8.5K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

621

Area of Science:

  • Evidence-based practice
  • Systematic review methodology

Background:

  • Systematic reviews synthesize existing research.
  • Replication is essential for scientific validity and reproducibility.
  • Clear guidelines for systematic review replication are lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and describe methods for determining when to replicate a systematic review.
  • To identify and describe methods for how to replicate a systematic review.

Main Methods:

  • Protocol development for a co-registered Cochrane and Campbell Review.
  • Focus on methodological aspects of systematic review replication.

Main Results:

  • This section will detail the identified and assessed methods for systematic review replication.
  • Findings will guide the decision-making process for undertaking review replications.

Conclusions:

  • Establishing clear methodologies for systematic review replication enhances research reliability.
  • This protocol provides a framework for consistent and rigorous review replication practices.