Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

19.0K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
19.0K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

2.6K
2.6K
Protein Complex Assembly02:41

Protein Complex Assembly

2.1K
2.1K
Transfer RNA Synthesis02:35

Transfer RNA Synthesis

2.9K
2.9K
RNA Editing02:23

RNA Editing

9.1K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
9.1K
mRNA Stability and Gene Expression02:51

mRNA Stability and Gene Expression

2.9K
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PKCα-mediated nuclear translocation of cGAS stabilizes β-catenin and drives metastasis.

Molecular cell·2026
Same author

Augmenting transcriptome annotations through the lens of splicing evolution.

Genome research·2026
Same author

Hash functions in nucleotide sequence analysis.

Genome research·2026
Same author

Hemodynamic effect of coil packing density after tubridge flow diverter for anterior circulation small and medium-sized aneurysms.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Impact of non-standardized reporting on reproducibility, usability, and integration in nasopharyngeal metagenomic research: a systematic review.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same author

Functional and cosmetic advantages of gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a randomized trial.

World journal of surgical oncology·2025
Same journal

Layered social competition coordinates reproductive hierarchy formation in ants.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Combination epigenetic-targeted therapy increases the immunogenicity of poorly immunogenic sarcomas.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Loss of LanC-like proteins delays post-injury regeneration of aging skeletal muscles.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Integrative Transfer Network: Deep Transfer Learning Across Populations and Prediction Targets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Confidence-supported label-free metabolic imaging with FPhaS phase autofluorescence microscopy.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Sequence-encoded autoinhibition couples mRNA decapping activity to phase separation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.6K

Transcript Assembly and Annotations: Bias and Adjustment.

Qimin Zhang1, Mingfu Shao1,2

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The Pennsylvania State University.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|May 3, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Transcript annotations significantly impact gene expression analysis and transcript assembly. Our study reveals that differing annotations, particularly at the intron level, cause biased results, and we offer a tool to mitigate this.

Keywords:
intron retentiontranscript annotationtranscript assembly

More Related Videos

RNA-Seq Analysis of Differential Gene Expression in Electroporated Chick Embryonic Spinal Cord
11:13

RNA-Seq Analysis of Differential Gene Expression in Electroporated Chick Embryonic Spinal Cord

Published on: November 1, 2014

14.7K
Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method
08:53

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method

Published on: May 2, 2025

441

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.6K
RNA-Seq Analysis of Differential Gene Expression in Electroporated Chick Embryonic Spinal Cord
11:13

RNA-Seq Analysis of Differential Gene Expression in Electroporated Chick Embryonic Spinal Cord

Published on: November 1, 2014

14.7K
Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method
08:53

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method

Published on: May 2, 2025

441

Area of Science:

  • Transcriptomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Transcript annotations are crucial for gene expression analysis and transcript assembly.
  • Discrepancies between major annotation sources (RefSeq, Ensembl/GENCODE) impact results.
  • The influence of annotations on transcript assembly accuracy is not fully understood.

Approach:

  • Investigated the impact of different transcript annotations on transcript assembly.
  • Compared structural similarities across annotations, identifying intron-chain level differences.
  • Analyzed biotype biases in annotated and assembled transcripts, focusing on intron retention.

Key Points:

  • Conflicting conclusions arise when evaluating transcript assemblers with different annotations.
  • Intron retention bias in annotations and assembly explains contradictory findings.
  • A novel tool (irtool) is developed to generate assemblies without intron retentions.

Conclusions:

  • Annotation choice significantly affects transcript assembly outcomes.
  • Addressing intron retention bias is key to accurate transcript assembly.
  • Guidance is provided for selecting appropriate assembly tools based on annotation characteristics.