Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

A Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell PBMC Engrafted Humanized Xenograft Model for Translational Immuno-oncology I-O Research
Published on: August 15, 2019
Preclinical models for development of immune-oncology therapies
Yufei Wang1, Sarah E Shelton2, Gabriella Kastrunes3
1Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abstract:
Immunotherapy has demonstrated great success in clinical treatment, especially for cancer care. Here we review preclinical models, including cell lines, three dimensional (3D) cultures, and mouse models to support the need for tools enabling the development of novel immune-oncology (I-O) therapies. While in vitro studies have the advantage of being relatively simpler, faster, and higher throughput than in vivo models, they must be designed carefully to recapitulate the biological conditions that influence drug efficacy. The growing prevalence of 3D in vitro and ex vivo models has enabled screening and mechanistic studies in more complex, tissue-like environments containing multiple interacting cell types. On the other hand, syngeneic mouse models have been instrumental in the historical development of immunotherapies and remain an important tool in drug development, despite lacking fidelity to certain aspects of human physiology and pathology. Xenograft and humanized mouse models address some of these challenges, yet present limitations of their own. Successful development and translation of new I-O therapies will likely require thoughtful combination of several of these preclinical models, and we aim to help research and development scientists utilize the appropriate tools and technologies to facilitate rapid transition from preclinical evaluation to clinical trials.
Insights
Developing novel immune-oncology (I-O) therapies requires careful selection of preclinical models. This review examines in vitro, 3D, and in vivo models to guide I-O drug development and clinical translation.
Area of Science:
- Preclinical research
- Drug development
- Immunotherapy
Background:
- Immunotherapy has shown significant success in cancer treatment.
- Developing novel immune-oncology (I-O) therapies requires robust preclinical models.
- Existing models have limitations impacting translation to clinical settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and analyze various preclinical models for I-O therapy development.
- To highlight the strengths and weaknesses of different model systems.
- To guide scientists in selecting appropriate tools for efficient drug development.
Main Methods:
- Review of in vitro cell lines and 3D cultures.
- Analysis of in vivo mouse models (syngeneic, xenograft, humanized).
- Comparison of model systems for recapitulating biological complexity and drug efficacy.
Main Results:
- In vitro models offer high throughput but require careful design.
- 3D in vitro and ex vivo models provide more complex, tissue-like environments.
- In vivo models like syngeneic, xenograft, and humanized mice are crucial but have limitations in human physiological fidelity.
Conclusions:
- A combination of diverse preclinical models is essential for successful I-O therapy development.
- Thoughtful selection and integration of models accelerate the transition from preclinical evaluation to clinical trials.
- Optimizing preclinical model selection is key to advancing novel immune-oncology treatments.
Related Concept Videos
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Preclinical Development: Overview

