Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025
Fertility Preservation in Patients with Severe Ovarian Dysfunction
Published on: March 25, 2021
A sharing oocyte donation program: a 15-year cohort stud
Talita Colombo1,2, Marta Ribeiro Hentschke2,3, Mariangela Badalotti2,3
1Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Objective:
To evaluate clinical and laboratory outcomes of oocyte donation cycles and compare the results from donors and recipients.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a reproductive medicine center. A 586 first fresh oocyte donation cycles, performed from 01/2002 to 12/2017 were included. The outcomes of 290 cycles from donors and 296 from recipients, resulting in 473 fresh embryo transfers, were analyzed. The oocyte division was equally made, whereas, at an odd amount, the donor always had a preference. The data were collected from an electronic database, and analyzed using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U-test or Student t-test depending on the data distribution, and multivariate logistic regression, considering p<0.05.
Results:
The main results comparing donor and recipient, were, respectively: fertilization rate (72.0±21.4 vs. 74.6±24.2, p<0.001), implantation rate (46.2% vs. 48.5%, p=0.67); clinical pregnancy rate (41.9% vs. 37.7%, p=0.39), live birth rates by transfer (33.3 vs. 37.7, p=0.54).
Conclusions:
Oocyte donation is often the way donors can access in vitro fertilization, and for recipients seems to be a good option for pregnancy. Demographic and clinical characteristics have a secondary role in oocyte donors under 35 years and patient without comorbidities under 50 years and were not associated with pregnancy outcomes, emphasizing the power of oocyte quality on the success of intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. An oocyte-sharing program that offers good and comparable results is fair and worth being encouraged.
