Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

A Method for Screening and Validation of Resistant Mutations Against Kinase Inhibitors
Published on: December 7, 2014
Differences in JAK Isoform Selectivity Among Different Types of JAK Inhibitors Evaluated for Rheumatic Diseases
Anniina Virtanen1, Maaria Palmroth2, Sanna Liukkonen2
1Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Objective:
The selectivity of JAK inhibitors (Jakinibs) forms the basis for understanding their clinical characteristics; however, evaluation of selectivity is hampered by the lack of comprehensive head-to-head studies. Our objective was to profile in parallel Jakinibs indicated or evaluated for rheumatic diseases for their JAK and cytokine selectivity in vitro.
Methods:
We analyzed 10 Jakinibs for JAK isoform selectivity by assaying their inhibition of JAK kinase activity, binding to kinase and pseudokinase domains, and inhibition of cytokine signaling using blood samples from healthy volunteers and using isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and from healthy donors.
Results:
Pan-Jakinibs effectively suppressed kinase activity of 2 to 3 JAK family members, whereas isoform-targeted Jakinibs possessed varying degrees of selectivity for 1 or 2 JAK family members. In human leukocytes, Jakinibs predominantly inhibited the JAK1-dependent cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-6, and interferons (IFNs). In PBMCs from patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with healthy controls, inhibition of these cytokines was more pronounced, and some cell-type and STAT isoform differences were observed. Novel Jakinibs demonstrated high selectivity: the covalent Jakinib ritlecitinib showed 900- to 2,500-fold selectivity for JAK3 over other JAKs and specific suppression of IL-2-signaling, whereas the allosteric TYK2 inhibitor deucravacitinib inhibited IFNα signaling with high specificity. Interestingly, deucravacitinib targeted the regulatory pseudokinase domain and did not affect JAK in vitro kinase activity.
Conclusion:
Inhibition of JAK kinase activity did not directly translate into cellular inhibition of JAK/STAT signaling. Despite differences in JAK selectivity, the cytokine inhibition profiles of currently approved Jakinibs were highly similar, with preference for JAK1-mediated cytokines. Novel types of Jakinibs showed narrow cytokine inhibition profile specific for JAK3- or TYK2-mediated signaling.
Related Concept Videos
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase Pathways
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Drug Binding to Blood Components
HSA is the most abundant plasma protein and is vital in drug binding. It contains distinct drug-binding sites, with different drugs exhibiting affinity for specific sites. There are three main drug-binding domains for HSA: sites I, II, and III. These domains are...
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction

