Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Rectal Organoid Morphology Analysis ROMA: A Diagnostic Assay in Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: June 10, 2022
Nonresponder Considerations for Romosozumab Treatment
Ayako Tominaga1, Keiji Wada2, Ken Okazaki2
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. tominaga.ayako@twmu.ac.jp.
Low early levels of type I procollagen N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) predict poor response to romosozumab treatment in osteoporosis patients. This finding aids clinicians in tailoring osteoporosis therapy for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Bone Metabolism
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Osteoporosis treatment aims to increase bone mineral density (BMD).
- Romosozumab effectively increases BMD, but patient response varies.
- Identifying nonresponders is crucial for optimizing osteoporosis management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify risk factors for nonresponse to romosozumab treatment.
- To evaluate the proportion of osteoporosis patients who do not achieve significant BMD increase with romosozumab.
- To determine predictors of romosozumab nonresponse.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective observational study of 92 osteoporosis patients.
- Romosozumab (210 mg) administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 12 months.
- Exclusion of patients with prior osteoporosis treatment to isolate romosozumab's effect.
- Comparison of demographics and biochemical markers between responders and nonresponders, defining nonresponse as <3% BMD change after 12 months.
Main Results:
- 11.5% of patients were nonresponders at the lumbar spine; 56.8% at the hip.
- Low type I procollagen N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) levels at 1 month (cutoff 50 ng/ml) were a risk factor for lumbar spine nonresponse.
- Significant BMD improvement was not observed in 11.5% (lumbar spine) and 56.8% (hip) of patients.
Conclusions:
- Early P1NP levels can predict romosozumab treatment response in osteoporosis.
- Clinicians can utilize identified risk factors to guide romosozumab treatment decisions.
- Further research may explore mechanisms behind variable romosozumab efficacy.
More Related Videos
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
08:20MRI-guided dmPFC-rTMS as a Treatment for Treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder
Published on: August 11, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Patient-Related Factors
Age stands as a key determinant in protein-drug binding. Neonates, characterized by low albumin content, experience heightened concentrations of unbound drugs such as phenytoin and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rational Dosage Regimen: Maintenance Dose and Loading Dose
In most cases, drugs are administered repetitively or infused continuously to maintain a steady-state concentration in the body. At a steady...
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy