Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

08:10
Evaluation of a Universal Nested Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Detection of Lyssaviruses
Published on: May 2, 2019
8.5K
A Multi-Laboratory Evaluation of Commercial Monkeypox Virus Molecular Tests
Oran Erster1, Itzchak Levy2, Areej Kabat1
1Central Virology Laboratory, Public Health Services, Ministry of Health, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Microbiology Spectrum
|May 4, 2023
Summary
This study evaluated commercial monkeypox virus (MPXV) PCR kits across Israeli labs. While sensitive, differences in Cq values mean direct comparison of results may be misleading for diagnostics.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Public Health
Background:
- Monkeypox virus (MPXV) poses a significant public health threat.
- Accurate and reliable diagnostic assays are crucial for MPXV detection and control.
- Commercial PCR kits offer potential for widespread diagnostic use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct the first national-scale, multi-laboratory evaluation of commercial MPXV DNA PCR kits.
- To compare the performance of two specific commercial kits (Novaplex and Bio-Speedy) against an in-house reference assay.
- To provide guidance for diagnostic laboratories in selecting appropriate MPXV detection assays.
Main Methods:
- Ten standardized samples were tested across multiple laboratories using Novaplex and Bio-Speedy kits.
- An in-house PCR assay served as the reference standard for comparison.
- Data on Cq values and relative fluorescence (RF) were collected and analyzed.
Main Results:
- All tested assays demonstrated high intra-assay agreement and sensitivity for detecting low viral loads.
- Significant differences in Cq values and relative fluorescence were observed between the commercial kits and the in-house assay.
- Novaplex showed lower RF signals, while Bio-Speedy had lower Cq values compared to the in-house assay.
Conclusions:
- Commercial MPXV PCR kits show comparable sensitivity but differ in measurement metrics (Cq, RF).
- Direct comparison of Cq values between different assays can be misleading.
- This evaluation offers crucial insights for selecting MPXV diagnostic assays in standard laboratory settings.

