Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
SAS and R code for probabilistic quantitative bias analysis for misclassified binary variables and binary unmeasured
Matthew P Fox1,2, Richard F MacLehose3, Timothy L Lash4
1Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) rarely quantifies systematic error in epidemiology due to software gaps. This study provides accessible SAS and R code to implement QBA for confounding and misclassification, aiding accurate inference.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiologic research methods
- Quantitative bias analysis (QBA)
- Statistical software implementation
Background:
- Systematic errors like selection bias, confounding, and misclassification are common in epidemiology.
- Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) is infrequently used due to a lack of accessible software tools.
- This limits the accurate quantification of systematic error's impact on research findings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide readily modifiable computing code for implementing QBA in epidemiologic studies.
- To enable analysts to tailor QBA methods to their specific datasets.
- To facilitate the quantification of bias from uncontrolled confounding and misclassification.
Main Methods:
- Description of QBA methods for misclassification and uncontrolled confounding.
- Provision of example code for SAS and R to implement QBA.
- Demonstration of QBA using both summary-level and individual record-level data.
Main Results:
- Code examples illustrate bias adjustment for uncontrolled confounding and misclassification.
- Bias-adjusted point estimates are compared with conventional results to show impact.
- 95% simulation intervals are generated and compared to confidence intervals to assess uncertainty.
Conclusions:
- Accessible code can increase the adoption of QBA in epidemiologic research.
- Implementing QBA helps prevent inaccurate inferences caused by unquantified systematic error.
- This approach improves the reliability and validity of epidemiologic study findings.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
12:18A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Analysis System (SAS)
Applications: SAS finds applications in numerous fields, including healthcare for clinical trial analysis, finance for risk assessment, marketing for customer data analysis, and...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks