Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors Beyond Progression in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Real-World

Lorenzo Gerratana1, Andrew A Davis2, Marko Velimirovic3,4

  • 1Department of Medical Oncology, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.

Abstract

Insights

Continuing cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) beyond progression improves outcomes for metastatic breast cancer patients. This strategy shows a significant prognostic impact, especially for patients with ESR1 mutations.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genomics
  • Translational Research

Background:

  • Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are a standard treatment for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
  • Continuation of CDK4/6i beyond progression (BP) is an emerging strategy, necessitating the identification of resistance factors and predictive biomarkers.
  • Understanding the impact of CDK4/6i BP is crucial for optimizing treatment sequencing and patient selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the clinical impact of continuing CDK4/6i beyond progression in HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC.
  • To explore potential genomic alterations that stratify patients for CDK4/6i BP efficacy.
  • To identify factors influencing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with or without CDK4/6i BP.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional cohort of HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC patients.
  • Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis using next-generation sequencing at baseline.
  • Statistical analysis including chi-square tests, univariable/multivariable Cox regression, and propensity score matching.

Main Results:

  • Among 214 patients, 42 received CDK4/6i BP and 172 received non-CDK4/6i treatment.
  • CDK4/6i BP, TP53 variants, liver involvement, and treatment line significantly impacted PFS and OS.
  • Propensity score matching confirmed the prognostic role of CDK4/6i BP. ESR1 and RB1 mutations were more frequent in the CDK4/6i BP group.

Conclusions:

  • The CDK4/6i BP strategy demonstrates a significant positive prognostic impact in HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC.
  • A potential differential benefit of CDK4/6i BP was observed in patients with ESR1 mutations.
  • Extensive biomarker characterization, particularly for ESR1, is warranted to guide CDK4/6i BP treatment decisions.