Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

232
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
232
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

12.6K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
12.6K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.7K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.7K
Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

60
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
60
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

5.9K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.9K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

WATCH: A Workflow to Assess Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Drug Development for Clinical Trial Sponsors.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Reply to 'Bayesian approaches in drug development: continuing the virtuous cycle'.

Nature reviews. Drug discovery·2024
Same author

CITIES: Clinical trials with intercurrent events simulator.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2023
Same author

Application of Bayesian approaches in drug development: starting a virtuous cycle.

Nature reviews. Drug discovery·2023
Same author

Estimating the treatment effect for adherers using multiple imputation.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2021
Same author

Single-cell transcriptomic landscape reveals tumor specific innate lymphoid cells associated with colorectal cancer progression.

Cell reports. Medicine·2021
Same journal

Comparison of Different Methods for the Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies-A Simulation Study.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

When to Adjust for Multiple Testing: A Unifying Guiding Principle.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

A Multiple Imputation Approach to Distinguish Curative From Life-Prolonging Effects in the Presence of Missing Covariates.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Tests for Categorical Data Beyond Pearson: A Distance Covariance and Energy Distance Approach.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.2K

A platform for comparing subgroup identification methodologies.

Stephen Ruberg1, Ying Zhang2, Hollins Showalter2

  • 1Analytix Thinking, LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|May 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new platform and challenge were created to compare subgroup identification methods for personalized medicine. This enables better understanding of which methods perform best in various clinical trial scenarios.

Keywords:
InnoCentive Challengemethods comparisonpersonalized medicinesubgroup identification

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

28.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.2K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

28.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Personalized Medicine

Background:

  • Subgroup identification methods are crucial for personalized medicine.
  • A need exists for a common platform to compare the effectiveness of these methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To create a platform for evaluating subgroup identification methods.
  • To foster the development and comparison of new approaches through a public challenge.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a common data-generating model for virtual clinical trial datasets.
  • Included scenarios with and without subgroups of exceptional responders.
  • Established a common scoring system for method performance evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Created an extensive evaluation platform and a public challenge.
  • Facilitated benchmarking of various subgroup identification methodologies.
  • Generated insights into method performance across different clinical trial situations.

Conclusions:

  • The developed platform allows for fair comparison of subgroup identification methods.
  • Recommendations are provided for the statistical community to improve method comparison.
  • This work advances the field of personalized medicine by clarifying optimal subgroup identification strategies.