Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

12.6K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
12.6K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

13.0K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
13.0K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.3K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.7K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.7K
Protein-Drug Binding: Mechanism and Kinetics01:16

Protein-Drug Binding: Mechanism and Kinetics

680
Protein-drug binding refers to the interaction between drugs and proteins within the body. This binding process can occur intracellularly, involving drug interactions with enzymes or receptors within cells, or extracellularly, involving plasma proteins in the blood.
Various forces drive these interactions, including hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, ionic bonds, electrostatic interactions, and van der Waals forces. These bonds enable drugs to bind to specific sites on proteins,...
680
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding01:13

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding

77
Physiological models with protein binding in pharmacokinetics offer a sophisticated approach to understanding drug disposition. These models consider drug-protein interactions, enabling them to effectively predict drug concentrations in different organs and tissues. This precision aids in accurate drug dosing, providing a significant advantage over conventional models. A key process within these models is equilibration, which ensures that drug concentrations achieve a steady state within the...
77

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Membrane protein solubilization and structure determination using de novo-designed proteins.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Controlling metal-carbonate phase, form, and function through de novo protein design.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Programmed synthesis of mesoporous protein crystals in cellular reactors.

Nature nanotechnology·2026
Same author

Systems-Scale Structural Modeling Reveals the Germline Architecture of Immunodominance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Generative design of programmable asymmetric β-barrel nanopores.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Author Correction: De novo design of quasisymmetric two-component protein cages.

Nature·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K

Improving de novo protein binder design with deep learning.

Nathaniel R Bennett1,2,3, Brian Coventry1,2,4, Inna Goreshnik1,2

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Nature Communications
|May 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Deep learning, using AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold, significantly improves de novo protein binder design success rates by 10-fold. ProteinMPNN enhances computational efficiency in sequence design.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.7K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.7K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Protein engineering
  • Artificial intelligence in drug discovery

Background:

  • De novo design of high-affinity protein binders is possible using target structural information.
  • Current de novo design methods have low success rates, indicating room for improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To augment energy-based protein binder design with deep learning methods.
  • To increase the success rate of de novo protein binder design.
  • To improve the computational efficiency of protein sequence design.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized deep learning models AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold to assess designed protein structures and binding probabilities.
  • Employed ProteinMPNN for sequence design, comparing its efficiency to Rosetta.
  • Augmented traditional energy-based design with deep learning predictions.

Main Results:

  • Deep learning augmentation increased protein binder design success rates nearly 10-fold.
  • AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold accurately predicted designed monomer structure adoption and target binding.
  • ProteinMPNN demonstrated considerable computational efficiency gains over Rosetta for sequence design.

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning significantly enhances the success rate and efficiency of de novo protein binder design.
  • AI-driven structure and binding probability assessment is crucial for improving protein design.
  • ProteinMPNN offers a computationally efficient alternative for sequence design in protein engineering.