Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Genetic Profiling for Fluorouracil Response in Gastric Cancer
Published on: May 10, 2024
Association of gamma-glutamyl transferase variability with risk of venous thrombosis
Yoonkyung Chang1, Heajung Lee2, Tae-Jin Song3
1Department of Neurology, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) is a biomarker of inflammation, and is known to be associated with stroke and atrial fibrillation. Venous thromboembolism (VT), a not uncommon thrombotic disorder, shares similar mechanisms with other thrombotic disorders including these stroke and atrial fibrillation. Given these associations, we intended to investigate the potential association between variability in GGT and VT. The study included data from the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort, comprising 1,085,105 participants with health examinations 3 or more times from 2003 to 2008. Variability indexes were the coefficient of variation, standard deviation, and variability independent of the mean. The occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VT) was defined with more than one claim of the following ICD-10 codes: deep VT (I80.2-80.3), pulmonary thromboembolism (I26), intraabdominal venous thrombosis (I81, I82.2, I82.3), or other VT (I82.8, I82.9). To determine the relationship of quartiles of GGT with incident VT risk, Kaplan-Meier survival curve and logrank test were used. Cox's proportional hazard regression was used to investigate the risk of VT occurrence by GGT quartile (Q1-Q4). A total of 1,085,105 subjects were incorporated in the analysis, and the average follow-up was 12.4 years (interquartile range 12.2-12.6). VT occurred in 11,769 (1.08%) patients. The GGT level was measured 5,707,768 times in this stud. Multivariable analysis showed that GGT variability were positively associated with the occurrence of VT. Compared to the Q1, the Q4 showed an adjusted HR of 1.15 (95% CI 1.09-1.21, p < 0.001) when using coefficient of variation, 1.24 (95% CI 1.17-1.31, p < 0.001) when using standard deviation, and 1.10 (95% CI 1.05-1.16, p < 0.001) when using variability independent of the mean. Increased variability of GGT may be related to an increased risk of VT. Maintaining a stable GGT level would be beneficial in reducing the risk of VT.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

