Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Soft-tissue tumors: MR imaging.

W G Totty, W A Murphy, J K Lee

    Radiology
    |July 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging effectively evaluates soft-tissue masses, though distinguishing benign from malignant lesions remains challenging. Both T1- and T2-weighted sequences are crucial for comprehensive mass assessment.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms in mice lacking expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase.

    Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology·2001
    Same author

    Chemosensitivity prediction by transcriptional profiling.

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2001
    Same author

    Delayed induction of alpha B-crystallin in activated glia cells of hippocampus in kainic acid-treated mouse brain.

    Journal of neuroscience research·2001
    Same author

    Sulfation of L-selectin ligands by an HEV-restricted sulfotransferase regulates lymphocyte homing to lymph nodes.

    Immunity·2001
    Same author

    Prognostic factors of hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic state.

    Chang Gung medical journal·2001
    Same author

    Comparison of CYFRA 21-1 and squamous cell carcinoma antigen in detecting nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2001
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Oncology

    Background:

    • Soft-tissue masses require accurate diagnostic imaging.
    • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a key modality for evaluating these lesions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the utility of MR imaging in characterizing soft-tissue masses.
    • To compare MR imaging performance against computed tomography (CT).

    Main Methods:

    • Evaluated 33 patients with suspected soft-tissue masses using MR imaging.
    • Utilized T1- and T2-weighted imaging sequences.
    • Conducted comparative studies with CT in 24 cases.

    Main Results:

    • MR imaging identified 32 masses (10 malignant, 22 benign).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Specific differentiating features between benign and malignant lesions were not identified.
  • MR imaging showed superiority or equivalence to CT in 92 comparisons.
  • MR imaging limitations included failure to detect calcification and gas in one case each.

    • Conclusions:

    • MR imaging is valuable for soft-tissue mass evaluation but cannot reliably differentiate benign from malignant types.
    • Both T1- and T2-weighted sequences are essential for complete mass assessment.
    • MR imaging generally performs comparably or better than CT for soft-tissue masses, with noted limitations.