Hemodialysis access flow measurement: Comparison of ultrasound dilution and ultrafiltration method on NIKKISO...

The methods of estimating vascular access (VA) flow rates are usually based on the indicator dilution theory by measuring recirculation during dialysis sessions.

This is an observational study comparing the VA flow rates measured by NIKKISO DBB-EXA™ and Transonic®. Sixty-five patients (38 M/27 F, mean age 72 ± 10 years) participated in the study. We measured the VA flow rates during dialysis twice with each method and repeated the procedure 7 days later.

In 130 double measurements for each method on the same day, mean flow with Transonic® was 1413±715 ml/min and with DBB-EXA™ 1297 ± 664 ml/min. In Bland-Altman analysis, the mean difference between the two methods was 159 ± 211 ml/min (limits of agreement: -274 and 572 ml/min). Eighty-one out of the 130 DBB-EXA™ measurements were within 25% of the Transonic® measurements (62% accuracy). Regarding reproducibility of each method on different days, mean difference in the Bland-Altman analysis was 29 ± 620 ml/min (limits of agreement: -1186 and 1244 ml/min) for the Transonic® measurements and 132 ± 625 ml/min (limits of agreement: -1092 and 1356 ml/min) for the DBB-EXA™ measurements. The measurements on two different days were within 25% of each other for 52 of the 65 patients (80%) with the Transonic® method, and for 35 of the 65 patients (54%) with the DBB-EXA™ method.

In conclusion, the DBB-EXA™ method underestimates VA flow rates compared to the Transonic® technique, resulting in a limited accuracy of 62%. There was poor reproducibility for both methods in different day measurements with better performance of the Transonic® technique. The DBB-EXA™ method could be used as a simple tool for a rough estimate of VA flow rates but cannot replace the Transonic® reference method.