Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Method of Joints01:30

Method of Joints

851
The method of joints is a commonly used technique to analyze the forces in structural trusses. The method is based on the principle of equilibrium, which assumes that the truss members are connected by frictionless pins. The forces at each joint can be determined by considering the equilibrium of the forces acting on that joint.
Since plane truss members are in the same plane, each joint is subjected to a coplanar and concurrent force system. To apply the method of joints, the first step is to...
851
Space Trusses: Problem Solving01:29

Space Trusses: Problem Solving

622
A space truss is a three-dimensional counterpart of a planar truss. These structures consist of members connected at their ends, often utilizing ball-and-socket joints to create a stable and versatile framework. Due to its adaptability and capacity to withstand complex loads, the space truss is widely used in various construction projects.
Consider a tripod consisting of a tetrahedral space truss with a ball-and-socket joint at C. Suppose the height and lengths of the horizontal and vertical...
622
Method of Sections: Problem Solving I01:27

Method of Sections: Problem Solving I

636
Consider a symmetrical roof truss structure, composed of vertical, diagonal, and horizontal members. The length of each horizontal member is 4 m. The lengths of the vertical members FB and HD are 4 m, while the length of member GC is 6 m. The loads acting at joints F, G, and H are 2 kN, while those at joints A and E are 1 kN.
636
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II01:30

Method of Joints: Problem Solving II

632
Consider a truss structure with frictionless joints fixed to a wall and roller support. If a force of 150 N is applied to joint A, the forces in each member of the truss can be determined using the method of joints.
632
Method of Sections: Problem Solving II01:30

Method of Sections: Problem Solving II

1.1K
Consider an arbitrary truss structure composed of diagonal, vertical, and horizontal members fixed to the wall. To calculate the force acting on members CB, GB, and GH, method of sections can be used. The loads and lengths of the horizontal and vertical members are known parameters, as shown in the figure.
1.1K
Method of Joints: Problem Solving I01:30

Method of Joints: Problem Solving I

1.2K
The method of joints is a commonly used technique to analyze the forces in structural trusses. The method is based on the principle of equilibrium, which assumes that the truss members are connected by frictionless pins. The forces at each joint can be determined by considering the equilibrium of the forces acting on that joint. Consider a truss structure with two forces of 20 N and 10 N acting at joints C and D, respectively. The method of joints can be used to determine the forces FCB, FDC,...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

RoseVisuals: A Multi-Class Dutch Rose Petal Images Dataset for Automated Health and Pigmentation Classification via Deep Learning.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

SaurKshetra: A curated dataset and ML-based classification for solar energy site selection.

Data in brief·2026
Same author

Epigenetic reprogramming of tissue-resident memory T cells in chronic inflammatory disorders and implications for targeted therapies.

Epigenomics·2026
Same author

MultiMindNet: AI-based mental health analysis using hybrid deep learning approach and Hybrid Ant-Grey Wolf Optimization (HAGWO) algorithm.

PLOS digital health·2026
Same author

ViTCNN: a robust hybrid CNN-Vision Transformer based deep learning framework for multi-disease diagnosis in women's healthcare.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Sustainable epoxy composites incorporating Aloe Vera and fly ash for bio derived reinforcement and circular economy advancement.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

From pixels to length: Body length estimation of aquatic macroinvertebrates from digital images for ecological applications.

MethodsX·2026
Same journal

Sorbent-coated metal discs for time-integrated VOC sampling: A reproducible workflow coupled to SPME-GC/MS.

MethodsX·2026
Same journal

Step-by-step <i>En face</i> O red oil method for aortic plaque staining and quantification in ApoE knockout mouse.

MethodsX·2026
Same journal

Optimized protocols for culturing and sectioning mouse intestinal organoids: enhancing efficiency and structural integrity.

MethodsX·2026
Same journal

MCLF: Montage consistent CNN-Liquid fusion for long-term scalp EEG seizure detection.

MethodsX·2026
Same journal

Facile synthesis of model polystyrene nanoparticles for nanoplastics research.

MethodsX·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K

Many‑objective meta-heuristic methods for solving constrained truss optimisation problems: A comparative analysis.

Natee Panagant1, Sumit Kumar2, Ghanshyam G Tejani3

  • 1Sustainable Infrastructure Research and Development Center, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.

Methodsx
|May 8, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares eighteen algorithms for many-objective truss optimization problems. MMIPDE demonstrated superior performance, highlighting advancements in structural optimization techniques.

Keywords:
BucklingConstraint optimizationEvolutionary methodsMany‑objective meta-heuristic methodsNatural frequencyStructural design

More Related Videos

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.0K
Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
14:23

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.0K
Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
14:23

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Structural Engineering
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Optimization Algorithms

Background:

  • Many-objective optimization problems in truss structures are complex and computationally demanding.
  • Existing optimization methods are often limited in addressing high-dimensional, multi-objective truss design challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively evaluate the performance of eighteen established algorithms on many-objective truss structure optimization problems.
  • To identify the most effective algorithms for solving small to large-scale truss design challenges with multiple objectives.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated eighteen well-established optimization algorithms across various dimensions.
  • Utilized four performance metrics and Friedman's rank test for statistical analysis.
  • Applied algorithms to small to large-scale truss design problems with mass, compliance, natural frequency, and buckling factor as objectives.

Main Results:

  • MMIPDE was identified as the top-performing algorithm in the overall comparison.
  • SHAMODE with whale optimization and SHAMODE were recognized as strong runners-up.
  • Statistical analysis confirmed significant performance differences among the evaluated algorithms.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a comprehensive assessment of modern algorithms for many-objective truss optimization.
  • MMIPDE offers a promising approach for efficient and effective truss structure design.
  • Further research can build upon these findings to develop more advanced optimization techniques.