Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
High-stakes decisions do not require narrative conviction but narrative flexibility
Fritz Breithaupt1,2, Milo Hicks2,3, Benjamin Hiskes1,2,3
1Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USAfbreitha@indiana.edu.
Abstract:
We challenge Johnson et al.'s assumption that people reduce unclear situations to a single narrative explanation and that such reduction would be adaptive for decision-making under radical uncertainty. Instead, we argue that people imagine and maintain multiple narrative possibilities throughout the decision-making process and that this process provides cognitive flexibility and adaptive benefits within the proposed model.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Hindsight Biases
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Reason and Intuition
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

