Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns
Kruthika Thangavelu1, Kyriakos Martakis2,3, Silke Feldmann4
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany. Kruthika.thangavelu@uk-gm.de.
Insights
False-positive results in newborn hearing screening are linked to prematurity and low birth weight. Higher infant age at screening also increases false-positives, impacting program effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Audiology
- Public health
Background:
- Newborn hearing screening is crucial for early detection of hearing loss.
- Improving the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of screening programs is essential.
- Understanding factors influencing false-positive results can optimize screening protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine referral and false-positive rates in a high-risk newborn hearing screening program.
- To identify factors associated with false-positive results in auditory brainstem response (ABR) screening.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 4512 newborns undergoing a two-stage AABR screening protocol.
- Analysis of referral rates, false-positive rates, and potential risk factors.
- Statistical analysis to assess associations between infant characteristics and false-positivity.
Main Results:
- The overall referral rate was 3.8%, with a false-positive rate of 2.9%.
- Higher birth weight and gestational age were associated with lower odds of false-positive results.
- Increased chronological age at screening correlated with higher odds of false-positive results.
Conclusions:
- Prematurity and low birth weight are significant contributors to false-positive hearing screening results in high-risk infants.
- Chronological age at the time of screening is a key factor influencing false-positive rates.
- These findings can inform strategies to enhance the efficiency of newborn hearing screening.
Aim:
More studies exploring referral rates and false-positive rates are needed to make hearing screening programs in newborns better and cost-effective. Our aim was to study the referral and false-positivity rates among high-risk newborns in our hearing screening program and to analyze the factors potentially associated with false-positive hearing screening test results.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study was done among the newborns hospitalized at a university hospital from January 2009 to December 2014 that underwent hearing screening with a two-staged AABR screening protocol. Referral rates and false-positivity rates were calculated and possible risk factors for false-positivity were analyzed.
Results:
4512 newborns were screened for hearing loss in the neonatology department. The referral rate for the two-staged AABR-only screening was 3.8% with false-positivity being 2.9%. Our study showed that the higher the birthweight or gestational age of the newborn, the lower the odds of the hearing screening results being false-positive, and the higher the chronological age of the infant at the time of screening, the higher the odds of the results being false-positive. Our study did not show a clear association between the mode of delivery or gender and false-positivity.
Conclusion:
Among high-risk infants, prematurity and low-birthweight increased the rate of false-positivity in the hearing screening, and the chronological age at the time of the test seems to be significantly associated with false-positivity.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot


