Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.3K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.3K
Force Classification01:22

Force Classification

1.3K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
1.3K
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

2.2K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.2K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.7K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.8K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deep convolutional models for robust multi-crop disease recognition in real-world conditions.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Video quality prediction and classification using XGBoost under variable encoding and network conditions.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Correction: NIDD-enabled lightweight intrusion detection for effective DDoS mitigation in 5G and beyond.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Lightweight malicious URL detection using deep learning and large language models.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

NIDD-enabled lightweight intrusion detection for effective DDoS mitigation in 5G and beyond.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Optimizing feature selection with random reversal and adaptive Gaussian based Dung beetle optimizer for intrusion detection system in IoT.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

A tri-axis optomechanical accelerometer with plasmonic MIM waveguide and structural direction-dependent optical signatures.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Holographic leaky-wave antennas with independently controlled multiple counter-rotating vortex beams.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Differential associations of longitudinal hearing and vision trajectories with dementia and mild cognitive impairment in older adults.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Abdominal obesity and leisure-time sedentary behavior in relation to gastroesophageal reflux disease risk: a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Effect of nitrogen-rich COF incorporation on the structure and separation performance of polyamide nanofiltration membranes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Withanolide A inhibits hIAPP aggregation: An In silico, biophysical, and drosophila-based In vivo validation.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

591

Deep fake detection and classification using error-level analysis and deep learning.

Rimsha Rafique1, Rahma Gantassi2, Rashid Amin3,4

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan, 47050.

Scientific Reports
|May 8, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an automated deep fake image detection system using deep learning and machine learning. The robust method achieves 89.5% accuracy, effectively distinguishing real from fake content to combat disinformation.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.9K
DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

830

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

591
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.9K
DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

830

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Image Processing

Background:

  • The proliferation of deep fakes on social media poses a significant threat due to the ease of creation and potential for spreading disinformation.
  • Traditional machine learning methods struggle with complex patterns and data variations inherent in deep fake detection.
  • A robust system is crucial for differentiating authentic content from manipulated media in the digital age.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate an automated method for classifying deep fake images.
  • To address the limitations of traditional machine learning in handling complex image manipulations.
  • To develop a reliable system for detecting deep fakes and mitigating their harmful effects.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a framework combining Error Level Analysis (ELA) for initial modification detection.
  • Utilized Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for deep feature extraction from images.
  • Classified features using Support Vector Machines (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) with hyper-parameter optimization.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method achieved a highest accuracy of 89.5% using a Residual Network and K-Nearest Neighbor classifier.
  • Demonstrated the efficiency and robustness of the automated deep fake detection approach.
  • Validated the system's capability to generalize to unseen data and handle variations.

Conclusions:

  • The developed deep learning and machine learning-based system effectively detects deep fake images.
  • The proposed technique offers a robust solution for combating disinformation and propaganda spread through manipulated media.
  • This automated method can be deployed to enhance content authenticity verification on social media platforms.