Latent Tuberculosis Infection and Associated Factors in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a Multicenter,...

The objectives of this study were to screen for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using the T-SPOT.TB assay and to identify factors affecting the assay results. SLE patients were enrolled from 13 tertiary hospitals in eastern, central, and western China from September 2014 to March 2016 and were screened using the T-SPOT.TB assay to detect LTBI. Basic information about the subjects was collected, including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), course of disease, evidence of previous tuberculosis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score, and the use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify factors affecting the results of the T-SPOT.TB assay. In all, 2,229 SLE patients were screened using the T-SPOT.TB assay, of whom 334 patients tested positive, yielding a positivity rate of 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.5% to 16.5%). The positivity rate was higher in male than female patients and had an increasing trend with age. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that patients over 40 (odds ratio [OR], 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.10) and with evidence of previous tuberculosis (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 2.81 to 6.99) were more likely to have positive T-SPOT.TB results, while patients with a SLEDAI-2K score of ≥10 (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.88), a glucocorticoid dose of ≥60 mg/d (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.98), leflunomide (LEF) treatment (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.88), or tacrolimus (FK506) treatment (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.00) were more likely to have negative T-SPOT.TB results. The frequencies of CFP-10-specific gamma interferon (IFN-γ)-secreting T cells were significantly lower in SLE patients with severe disease activity or high-dose glucocorticoids (P < 0.05). The positivity rate of the T-SPOT.TB assay was 15% among SLE patients. Severe, active SLE disease and the use of high-dose glucocorticoids and some types of immunosuppressants are likely to result in negative T-SPOT.TB results. For SLE patients with the above conditions, diagnosing LTBI based on a positive T-SPOT.TB result may lead to underestimation of the prevalence. IMPORTANCE The burden of tuberculosis and systemic lupus erythematosus in China ranks among the top three in the world. Therefore, active screening for LTBI and preventive intervention in SLE patients are of great significance in China. In view of the lack of relevant data in a large sample, we conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study using T-SPOT.TB as a screening method for LTBI, to investigate the prevalence of LTBI and analyze the factors affecting the results of the T-SPOT.TB assay in SLE patients. Our study showed that the overall positivity rate of the T-SPOT.TB assay in SLE patients was 15.0%, which was lower than the estimated LTBI prevalence in the general population in China (~20%). For SLE patients with severe, active disease, high-dose glucocorticoids, and some types of immunosuppressants, a diagnosis of LTBI based on only positive T-SPOT.TB results may lead to underestimation of the prevalence.