Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

A Zebrafish Model of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Memory
Published on: February 28, 2013
Impact of Second-Line Combination Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Disease Control: A Population-Based
Dan Ouchi1,2,3, Carles Vilaplana-Carnerero4,5,6, Ramon Monfà4,5,6
1Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587, 08007, Barcelona, Spain. douchi@idiapjgol.info.
Background:
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease affecting millions of people worldwide. Achieving and maintaining glycemic control is essential to prevent or delay complications and different strategies are available as second-line treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not achieve glycemic control with metformin monotherapy.
Objective:
The aim of this work is to describe the impact of initiating a combination treatment to reduce glycated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes with insufficient glycemic control.
Methods:
We included patients with a type 2 diabetes diagnosis between 2015 and 2020 at the Information System for Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP) database in Catalonia, Spain. The primary outcome was the time to glycated hemoglobin control (≤ 7%) during the first 720 days, expressed as the restricted mean survival time. Adjusted differences of the restricted mean survival time were compared to analyze the performance of each treatment versus the combination with a sulfonylurea. Adherence was calculated as the medication possession ratio using an algorithm to model treatment exposure.
Results:
A total of 28,425 patients were analyzed. The most frequent combinations were those with sulfonylureas and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. All treatments reduced glycated hemoglobin and the restricted mean survival time for the sulfonylurea treatment was 455 (451-459) days although combinations with glucagon-like peptide-1 and insulin reached glycemic control earlier, - 126 days (- 152 to - 100, p < 0.001) and - 69 days (- 88 to - 50, p < 0.001), respectively. Adherence was high in all groups apart from the insulin combination and had a significant effect in reducing glycated hemoglobin except in sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors and insulin. Glucagon-like peptide-1 and sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors showed significant reductions in weight.
Conclusions:
Patients achieved the glycated hemoglobin goal with second-line treatments. Glucagon-like peptide-1 and insulin combinations achieved the goal earlier than sulfonylurea combinations. Adherence significantly reduced the time to glycated hemoglobin control except for the combination with sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors.
Insights
Second-line treatments for type 2 diabetes effectively lower glycated hemoglobin. Glucagon-like peptide-1 and insulin combinations achieve glycemic control faster than sulfonylureas, improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Diseases
- Pharmacotherapy
Background:
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus affects millions globally, necessitating effective glycemic control to prevent complications.
- Metformin monotherapy is a common first-line treatment, but many patients require additional agents for adequate blood sugar management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of initiating combination therapies on reducing glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in type 2 diabetes patients with insufficient glycemic control.
- To compare the efficacy of various second-line treatment strategies against sulfonylurea combinations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 28,425 patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes between 2015-2020 from the SIDIAP database.
- Primary outcome: time to achieve HbA1c control (≤7%) within 720 days, measured by restricted mean survival time (RMST).
- Medication adherence assessed via medication possession ratio; treatment performance compared using adjusted RMST differences.
Main Results:
- All evaluated second-line treatments reduced HbA1c levels.
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and insulin combinations achieved glycemic control significantly earlier than sulfonylurea combinations (p < 0.001).
- GLP-1 and sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors demonstrated significant weight reduction; adherence positively impacted glycemic control in most groups.
Conclusions:
- Second-line treatments are effective in achieving glycemic targets for type 2 diabetes patients.
- GLP-1 receptor agonists and insulin combinations offer faster HbA1c control compared to sulfonylureas.
- High adherence is crucial for timely glycemic control, with notable exceptions for SGLT2 inhibitor combinations.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Carbohydrate Metabolism
Starch accounts for approximately 60% of the carbohydrates consumed by humans. Since amylase enzymes cannot function in the stomach's acidic environment, starch can only be digested in the mouth and small intestine. Simple sugars are found naturally in milk and fruits in...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...

