Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

A Methodological Approach to Non-invasive Assessments of Vascular Function and Morphology
Published on: February 7, 2015
Comparing ultrasonographically assessed carotid and abdominal aorta plaques in cardiovascular disease risk estimation
Karri Parkkila1, Y Antero Kesäniemi2, Olavi Ukkola2
1Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. karri.parkkila@student.oulu.fi.
Insights
Carotid artery plaques, but not abdominal aorta plaques, significantly predict fatal cardiovascular events. Ultrasound assessment of carotid plaques is preferred for refining cardiovascular risk estimation over abdominal aorta plaques.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Ultrasound
- Atherosclerosis Research
Background:
- Cardiovascular (CV) disease prevention relies on accurate individual risk estimation.
- International guidelines recommend ultrasound assessment of carotid artery plaques for refining CV risk.
- Limited research compares carotid artery and abdominal aorta plaques for CV risk estimation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the prognostic value of carotid artery plaques versus abdominal aorta plaques in predicting cardiovascular events.
- To determine if plaque presence in these locations improves risk stratification beyond traditional factors.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 1007 participants from the Oulu Project Elucidating Risk of Atherosclerosis (OPERA).
- Clinical examination in the early 1990s with follow-up until 2014 for fatal and non-fatal CV events.
- Analysis of carotid and abdominal aorta plaques as predictors of CV events, adjusting for traditional risk factors.
Main Results:
- Both carotid and abdominal aorta plaques were significant risk factors for aggregate CV events (p < 0.001).
- Only carotid plaques significantly predicted fatal CV events (aHR 2.563, p = 0.001).
- Adding carotid plaques to a baseline model improved risk reclassification and discrimination (C-statistic to 0.743) more than abdominal aorta plaques.
Conclusions:
- Carotid and abdominal aorta plaques are significant CV event risk factors.
- Carotid plaques offer unique prognostic information for fatal CV events beyond traditional risk factors.
- Carotid plaque assessment is recommended over abdominal aorta plaque assessment for CV risk estimation.
Background:
Individual risk estimation is an essential part of cardiovascular (CV) disease prevention. Several imaging parameters have been studied for this purpose. Based on mounting evidence, international guidelines recommend the ultrasound assessment of carotid artery plaques to refine individual risk estimation. Previous studies have not compared carotid artery and abdominal aorta plaques in CV risk estimation. Our aim was to explore this matter in a prospective study setting.
Methods:
Participants were part of the Oulu Project Elucidating Risk of Atherosclerosis (OPERA) project. All participants (n = 1007, 50% males, aged 51.3 ± 6.0 years) were clinically examined in the beginning of 1990's and followed until the end 2014 for fatal and non-fatal CV events.
Results:
During a median follow-up of 22.5 (17.5-23.2) years, 246 (24%) participants suffered a CV event and 79 (32%) of those CV events were fatal. When compared to those without plaques, both carotid (hazard ratio, HR 2.854 [95% confidence interval, CI, 2.188-3.721, p < 0.001) and abdominal aorta plaques (HR 2.534 [1.503-4.274], p < 0.001) were major risk factors for CV events as an aggregate endpoint. These associations remained even after adjusting the multivariable models with age, sex, systolic blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, LDL cholesterol, and with previous CV events (coronary artery disease and stroke/transient ischemic attack). However, only carotid plaques were significant risk factors for fatal CV events: multivariable adjusted HR 2.563 (1.452-4.524), p = 0.001. Furthermore, reclassification and discrimination parameters were improved only when carotid plaques were added to a baseline risk model. Adding abdominal aorta plaques to the baseline risk model improved C-statistic from 0.718 (0.684-0.751) to 0.721 (0.688-0.754) whereas carotid plaques improved it to 0.743 (0.710-0.776).
Conclusions:
Both carotid and abdominal aorta plaques are significant risk factors for CV events, but only carotid plaques provide prognostic information beyond traditional CV risk factors on fatal CV events. If one ultrasound parameter for plaque detection and CV risk estimation had to be chosen, carotid plaques may be preferred over abdominal aorta.
More Related Videos
07:12Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
10:02Quantification of Atherosclerotic Plaque Activity and Vascular Inflammation using [18-F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography FDG-PET/CT
Published on: May 2, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation