Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

10:48
How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging
Published on: June 3, 2013
22.3K
Periaqueductal gray matter and medial prefrontal cortex reflect negative prediction errors during differential
Adam X Gorka1, Ryan T Philips1, Salvatore Torrisi2,3
1Section on the Neurobiology of Fear & Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
|May 10, 2023
Summary
Negative prediction errors (PEs) in associative learning impact brain responses. This study found that the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) and medial prefrontal cortex are involved in processing these errors during Pavlovian learning.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Computational Psychiatry
Background:
- Negative prediction errors (PEs) are theorized to weaken aversive associations in associative learning.
- Clinical anxiety may involve exaggerated responses linked to PEs, particularly concerning conditioned stimuli (CS+) and (CS-).
- The periaqueductal gray matter's (PAG) role in human negative PE processing remains unclear, despite its known function in animal extinction learning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of negative PEs on human PAG activity and connectivity.
- To explore the neural mechanisms underlying negative PEs in Pavlovian conditioning and extinction.
Main Methods:
- Utilized ultra-high-field (7 Tesla) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
- Employed hierarchical Bayesian analysis to model brain responses and connectivity.
- Examined participants during differential conditioning tasks involving aversive outcomes.
Main Results:
- Negative PEs during differential conditioning correlated with increased activity in the lateral and dorsolateral PAG.
- Observed enhanced connectivity between the dorsolateral PAG and medial Brodmann area 9 during negative PEs.
- Identified a link between PAG activity, medial prefrontal cortex connectivity, and the omission of aversive outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The study elucidates the involvement of the PAG and medial prefrontal cortex in processing negative prediction errors.
- Findings suggest a neural basis for how the brain learns from the absence of expected aversive outcomes.
- Provides insights into potential neural mechanisms relevant to anxiety disorders and associative learning.

