Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Modeling careless responding in ambulatory assessment studies using multilevel latent class analysis: Factors
Kilian Hasselhorn1, Charlotte Ottenstein2, Tanja Lischetzke2
1Department of Psychology, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau.
Abstract:
As the number of studies using ambulatory assessment (AA) has been increasing across diverse fields of research, so has the necessity to identify potential threats to AA data quality such as careless responding. To date, careless responding has primarily been studied in cross-sectional surveys. The goal of the present research was to identify latent profiles of momentary careless responding on the occasion level and latent classes of individuals (who differ in the distribution of careless responding profiles across occasions) on the person level using multilevel latent class analysis (ML-LCA). We discuss which of the previously proposed indices seem promising for investigating careless responding in AA studies, and we show how ML-LCA can be applied to model careless responding in intensive longitudinal data. We used data from an AA study in which the sampling frequency (3 vs. 9 occasions per day, 7 days, n = 310 participants) was experimentally manipulated. We tested the effect of sampling frequency on careless responding using multigroup ML-LCA and investigated situational and respondent-level covariates. The results showed that four Level 1 profiles ("careful," "slow," and two types of "careless" responding) and four Level 2 classes ("careful," "frequently careless," and two types of "infrequently careless" respondents) could be identified. Sampling frequency did not have an effect on careless responding. On the person (but not the occasion) level, motivational variables were associated with careless responding. We hope that researchers might find the application of an ML-LCA approach useful to shed more light on factors influencing careless responding in AA studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
More Related Videos
06:48Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
07:43Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
Published on: August 4, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...