Bilateral tonic seizures vs. bilateral tonic events in critically ill patients: differences in semiology

Our primary aim was to analyze bilateral epileptic tonic seizures (ETS) and bilateral non-epileptic tonic events (NTE) in critically ill patients. Our secondary aim was to analyze ETS per their epileptogenic zone.

We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical signs in patients with bilateral ETS and NTE. Two authors independently reviewed 34 videos of ETS in 34 patients and 15 videos of NTEs in 15 patients. Initial screening and review was performed in an unblinded manner. Subsequently, the semiology was characterized independently and blindly by a co-author. Statistical analysis was conducted using Bonferroni correction and two-tailed Fischer exact test. Positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated for all signs. Cluster analysis of signs with a PPV >80% was performed to evaluate co-occurring semiological features in the two groups.

Compared to patients with ETS, those with NTEs more frequently had predominant involvement of proximal upper extremities (UE) (67% vs. 21%), internal rotation of UE (67% vs. 3%), adduction of UE (80% vs. 6%) and bilateral elbow extension (80% vs. 6%). In contrast, those with ETS more frequently had abduction of UE (82% vs 0%), elevation of UE (91% vs. 33%), open eyelids (74% vs. 20%), and involvement of both proximal and distal UE (79% vs. 27%). In addition, seizures that remained symmetrical throughout were more likely to have a generalized onset than focal (38% vs. 6%), p = 0.032, PPV 86%.

A careful analysis of semiology can often help differentiate between ETS and NTE in the ICU. The combination of eyelids open, upper extremity abduction, and elevation reached a PPV of 100% for ETS. The combination of bilateral arms extension, internal rotation, and adduction reached a PPV of 90.9% for NTE.