Localized Endometrial Proliferations of Pregnancy are Clonal Glandular Outgrowths Characterized by PTEN Loss and...

Gestational endometrium can demonstrate a spectrum of atypical but benign changes. One such lesion is localized endometrial proliferation of pregnancy (LEPP), first described in a series of 11 cases. To understand its biological and clinical importance, we explore the pathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of this entity. Nine cases of LEPP identified in 15 years were retrieved from departmental archives and reviewed. Immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing using a comprehensive 446-gene panel were performed when the material was available. Eight cases were identified in curettage specimens performed after first-trimester pregnancy loss, and 1 in the basal plate of a mature placenta. The mean patient age was 35 (range 27-41) years. The mean lesion size was 6.3 (range 2-12) mm. Architectural patterns, often coexisting in the same case, included cribriform (n = 7), solid (n = 5), villoglandular (n = 2), papillary (n = 2), and micropapillary (n = 1). Cytologic atypia was mild in 7 cases and moderate in 2. Mitotic activity was low (up to 3 per 2.4 mm²). All lesions were associated with neutrophils. Background Arias-Stella phenomenon was present in 4 cases. Immunohistochemistry was performed in 7 LEPP, all of which demonstrated wildtype p53, retained MSH6 and PMS2, membranous beta-catenin, and positive estrogen receptor (mean 71%) and progesterone receptor (mean 74%). All were negative for p40 except 1 case (focal weak positivity). PTEN was markedly reduced in background secretory glands in all cases; in 5/7, LEPP foci showed a complete absence of PTEN expression. PIK3CA pathogenic variants were identified in 4/4 cases sequenced; 3/4 had inactivating PTEN mutations. Follow-up, available in 8 patients (mean length = 51 months, range 7-161), was conservative with observation only and showed no persistence or adverse outcomes. LEPP is characterized by intraglandular cribriform/solid architecture, positive estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor, PTEN loss, and PIK3CA and PTEN mutations. Although our findings indicate that LEPP is neoplastic, for now, we advise against diagnosing LEPP as endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia because LEPP has a particular clinicopathologic context (concurrent gestation), distinct morphology (purely intraepithelial complex growth), and indolent outcome. Thus, it should be distinguished from endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma for which therapeutic interventions are indicated.