Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

522
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
522
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

402
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
402
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

372
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
372
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.0K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.0K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

37.8K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
37.8K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

60.7K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Effects of Common Antihypertensive Class Medications on BMI z-Score in Adolescents.

Pediatric obesity·2026
Same author

Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir HIV PrEP Uptake, Adherence, and Persistence in Two Large US Integrated Healthcare Systems.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2026
Same author

Illustrating Implications of Misaligned Causal Questions and Statistics in Settings With Competing Events and Interest in Treatment Mechanisms.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Counterfactual Harm: A Counter-argument.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Response to "Beyond Adherence: Unraveling Methodological Complexity in Comparative Weight Change Among Antidiabetic Agents".

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.0K

Causal inference with recurrent and competing events.

Matias Janvin1, Jessica G Young2,3,4, Pål C Ryalen5

  • 1Department of Mathematics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. matias.janvin@epfl.ch.

Lifetime Data Analysis
|May 12, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study formalizes causal inference for recurrent events, incorporating competing risks like death. New causal estimands are defined, offering clinically relevant insights for treatment effects.

Keywords:
Causal inferenceCompeting eventsEvent history analysisRecurrent eventsSeparable effects

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.2K
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

34.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.0K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.2K
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

34.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Recurrent events (e.g., hospitalizations, injuries) are common in clinical research.
  • Competing events (e.g., death) complicate the analysis of recurrent events.
  • Formal causal interpretations of statistical estimands in these settings are lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To formalize causal estimands for recurrent events with and without competing events.
  • To clarify the causal interpretation of existing statistical estimands.
  • To introduce novel causal estimands relevant to clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a formal causal inference framework, including causal directed acyclic graphs and single world intervention graphs.
  • Applied counting process theory to connect discrete and continuous time analyses.
  • Developed and validated estimators for proposed causal estimands.

Main Results:

  • Established formal causal interpretations for classical estimands in the presence of competing events.
  • Defined new interventionist mediation estimands for recurrent and competing events.
  • Demonstrated the convergence of discrete-time causal estimands to continuous-time counterparts.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed causal framework provides a rigorous approach to analyzing recurrent events with competing risks.
  • New causal estimands offer enhanced clinical relevance for understanding treatment effects.
  • The methods were successfully applied to real-world data on blood pressure treatment and kidney injury recurrence.