Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Challenges and Burdens in the Coronary Artery Disease Care Pathway for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary
Monika Kodeboina1,2,3, Kerstin Piayda4,5, Inge Jenniskens6
1Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
Insights
Inefficiencies in coronary artery disease (CAD) care, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), lead to significant burdens. Solutions involve integrating technology and automation to improve CAD patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Services Research
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) care pathways face clinical and economic challenges despite advancements in diagnosis, treatment, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) utilization.
- A comprehensive assessment of these pathway-wide challenges, encompassing clinician, patient, and economic burdens, is notably scarce in current research.
- Recent studies highlight the potential benefits of integrating and automating processes within catheterization laboratories and the broader CAD care continuum.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a contemporary review identifying inefficiencies across the CAD care pathway, focusing on diagnosis, treatment, and management.
- To analyze clinician, patient, and economic burdens associated with CAD care, particularly concerning percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- To explore studies demonstrating the advantages of technological integration and automation in improving the CAD care pathway.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review of studies published within the last 5-10 years, primarily from North America and Europe.
- Inclusion of research focusing on inefficiencies in CAD diagnosis, treatment, and management, including PCI-related aspects.
- Identification of studies examining the impact of integration and automation on the CAD care pathway and catheterization laboratory workflow.
Main Results:
- Multiple avoidable inefficiencies were identified across the CAD care pathway, specifically related to PCI access, appropriate use, conduct, and follow-up.
- Documented inefficiencies include misdiagnosis, emergency care delays, suboptimal testing, prolonged procedure times, recurrent cardiac event risks, incomplete treatment, and post-acute care access/adherence issues.
- Factors negatively impacting workflow and patient care within the CAD pathway include clinician burnout, complex technologies, radiation exposure, and contrast media use.
Conclusions:
- Greater integration and interoperability of technologies and systems are crucial for addressing CAD care inefficiencies.
- Improved standardization and increased automation offer potential solutions to reduce burdens on clinicians and patients within the CAD pathway.
- Implementing these solutions can lead to significant improvements in patient outcomes and overall efficiency in coronary artery disease management.
Abstract:
Clinical and economic burdens exist within the coronary artery disease (CAD) care pathway despite advances in diagnosis and treatment and the increasing utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, research presenting a comprehensive assessment of the challenges across this pathway is scarce. This contemporary review identifies relevant studies related to inefficiencies in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of CAD, including clinician, patient, and economic burdens. Studies demonstrating the benefits of integration and automation within the catheterization laboratory and across the CAD care pathway were also included. Most studies were published in the last 5-10 years and focused on North America and Europe. The review demonstrated multiple potentially avoidable inefficiencies, with a focus on access, appropriate use, conduct, and follow-up related to PCI. Inefficiencies included misdiagnosis, delays in emergency care, suboptimal testing, longer procedure times, risk of recurrent cardiac events, incomplete treatment, and challenges accessing and adhering to post-acute care. Across the CAD pathway, this review revealed that high clinician burnout, complex technologies, radiation, and contrast media exposure, amongst others, negatively impact workflow and patient care. Potential solutions include greater integration and interoperability between technologies and systems, improved standardization, and increased automation to reduce burdens in CAD and improve patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

