Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025
Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
Published on: February 14, 2025
Outcomes of patients undergoing single-level arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion
Syed I Khalid1, Daniel Deysher2, Kyle Thompson3
1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 912 South Wood Street, 451N - MC 799, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. syed.khalid@me.com.
Background:
Compared to vertebral body fusion, artificial discs are thought to lessen the risks of adjacent segment disease and the need for additional surgery by maintaining spinal mobility as they mimic the intervertebral disc structure. No studies have compared the rates of postoperative complications and the requirement for secondary surgery at adjacent segments among patients who have undergone anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIF) versus those undergoing lumbar arthroplasty.
Methods:
An all-payer claims database identified 11,367 individuals who underwent single-level ALIF and lumbar arthroplasty for degenerative disc disease (DDD) between January 2010 and October 2020. Rates of complications following surgery, the need for additional lumbar surgeries, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative opioid utilization were assessed in matched cohorts based on logistic regression models. Kaplan-Meyer plots were created to model the probability of additional surgery.
Results:
Following 1:1 exact matching, 846 records of patients who had undergone ALIF or lumbar arthroplasty were analyzed. All-cause readmission within 30-30 days following surgery was significantly higher in patients undergoing ALIF versus arthroplasty (2.6% vs. 0.71%, p = 0.02). LOS was significantly lower among the patients who had undergone ALIF (1.043 ± 0.21 vs. 2.17 ± 1.7, p < .001).
Conclusions:
ALIF and lumbar arthroplasty procedures are equally safe and effective in treating DDD. Our findings do not support that single-level fusions may biomechanically necessitate revisional surgeries.
