Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
How tall am I again? A longitudinal analysis of the reliability of self-reported height
Ann Evans1, Edith Gray1, Anna Reimondos1
1School of Demography, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Abstract:
Self-reported height measures are increasingly being included in large-scale surveys in order to measure BMI. There have been concerns about the validity of self-reported measures but there remains little understanding of why respondents may not give accurate height reports. We examine whether a lack of knowledge could be a contributing factor, by investigating the reliability of self-reported height over time and across countries. We use longitudinal data from four large-scale longitudinal surveys conducted in Australia, United States, United Kingdom, and Europe (14 countries) where survey respondents were asked to report their height over multiple time periods to measure the extent of consistency of height reports across time. The overall level of inconsistent reporting of height is largest in Australia and Europe. Individuals with lower levels of education were significantly more likely to give two height reports that differed by 5 cm or more. Across all countries, inconsistent reporting with large height differences between waves was also more common among those in older populations. The findings point to subgroups of the population exhibiting a lack of knowledge regarding their own height.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Longitudinal Studies
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Polygenic Traits

