Patterns of treatment failure for PD-(L)1 refractory extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in continued PD-(L)1...

Although immunotherapy greatly extends overall survival (OS) of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), a number of patients develop immunotherapy resistance (IR). Patterns of failure in ES-SCLC are not clarified. Our study aims to explore the clinical pattern of IR and prognostic factors for these patients.

The study was conducted from 117 ES-SCLC patients with immunotherapy between 2018 and 2022. Chi-square tests and Fishers' exact tests was used to explore failure patterns in different populations. Survival analyses of different progression patterns and subsequent treatment regimens were conducted by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test.

86 (73.5%) patients experienced IR. The patients with smoking (never smoker vs. current or ex-smoker, 59.5 % vs. 81.3%, P = 0.010), liver metastasis (extrahepatic metastasis vs. intrahepatic metastasis, 73.6 % vs. 90.9%, P = 0.050), and distant metastasis status (no distant metastasis vs. distant metastasis, 39.1 % vs. 81.9%, P<0.001) were associated with IR rates. Liver progression had a lower incidence in 1st line immunotherapy (1st line vs. ≥2nd lines, 14.0 % vs. 41.7%, P = 0.004) and a higher incidence in multiple progression (multiple progression vs. Oligo-progression, 39.4 % vs. 17.0%, P = 0.021). Cranial (41.7 % vs. 16.1%, P = 0.012) and distant lymph node (16.7 % vs. 3.2%, P = 0.049) progression were the main failure model for acquired IR in comparison to primary IR. Patients with new lesion progression only (17.73 vs. 9.17 months, P = 0.013) and non-hepatic progression (14.23 vs. 11.67 months, P = 0.042) had a longer OS. Patients in cross-line immunotherapy after IR had a favourable prognosis (17.07 vs. 11.93 months, P = 0.007).

The most common failure pattern of immunotherapy for ES-SCLC was lung and regional lymph node progression. Brain and liver progression were the most common extra thoracic failure sites for 1st line and 2nd and more lines immunotherapy, respectively. There was a higher probability of primary IR in 2 lines and above immunotherapy. Patients with new only progression site and cross-line rechallenge immunotherapy had a better prognosis.