Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
The Multi-dimensional Assessment of Suicide Risk in Chronic illness-20 (MASC-20): Development and validation
Eun-Jung Shim1, Hyeju Ha1, Bo-Ram Kim2
1Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Background:
We developed and tested the psychometric properties of the Multi-dimensional assessment of suicide risk in chronic illness-20 (MASC-20), which assess suicidal behavior (SB), and its associated distress in chronic physical illness (CPI).
Methods:
Items were developed by incorporating inputs from patient interviews, a review of existing instruments, and expert consultations. Pilot testing with 109 patients and field testing with 367 patients with renal, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular diseases were conducted. We analyzed Time (T) 1 data to select items and T2 data to examine psychometric properties.
Results:
Forty preliminary items were selected through pilot testing; 20 were finalized from field testing. Optimal internal consistency (α = 0.94) and test-retest reliability (Intra class correlation coefficient = 0.92) of the MASC-20 supported reliability. Good fit of the four-factor model (physical distress, psychological distress, social distress, and SB) from exploratory structural equation modeling demonstrated factorial validity. Its correlations with MINI suicidality (r = 0.59) and the Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death-abbreviated scores (r = 0.62) indicated convergent validity. Higher MASC-20 scores in patients with clinical levels of depression and anxiety and low health status demonstrated known-group validity. The MASC-20 distress score predicted SB beyond known SB risk factors, supporting incremental validity. A cutoff score of 16 was optimal for identifying suicide risk. The area under the curve was within a moderately accurate range. The sum of sensitivity and specificity (1.66) indicated diagnostic utility.
Limitations:
MASC-20's applicability to other patient populations and its sensitivity to change requires testing.
Conclusions:
The MASC-20 appears to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing SB in CPI.
More Related Videos
08:25Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
Published on: December 6, 2024
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Stress and Mental Health
Individuals with depression often experience challenges in both their personal and professional...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...