Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

07:18
Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Published on: February 18, 2022
1.8K
Automated Macular Fluid Volume As a Treatment Indicator for Diabetic Macular Edema
Kotaro Tsuboi1, Qi Sheng You1,2, Yukun Guo1
1Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Journal of Vitreoretinal Diseases
|May 15, 2023
Summary
Macular fluid volume (MFV) accurately predicts treatment needs for diabetic macular edema (DME) better than central subfield thickness (CST). This AI-driven MFV analysis aids in managing DME effectively.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision loss.
- Accurate assessment of DME severity is crucial for timely treatment.
- Current methods like central subfield thickness (CST) may not fully capture disease activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of automatically quantified macular fluid volume (MFV) for identifying treatment-required diabetic macular edema (DME).
- To compare the performance of MFV against CST and visual acuity (VA) in predicting treatment decisions for DME.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography scans from 139 eyes with DME.
- A custom deep-learning algorithm automatically quantified MFV.
- Retina specialists made treatment decisions based on standard clinical and OCT findings, without MFV data.
Main Results:
- Macular fluid volume (MFV) showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) (0.81) than CST (0.67) in predicting treatment decisions (P=.0048).
- MFV, not CST, was significantly associated with treatment decisions in multivariate analysis (P=.0008).
- Untreated eyes meeting MFV treatment thresholds had better visual acuity than treated eyes (P=.0053).
Conclusions:
- Automatically quantified MFV is a more accurate predictor of treatment needs in DME compared to CST.
- MFV may serve as a valuable tool for the ongoing management and monitoring of diabetic macular edema.
- AI-driven MFV quantification offers potential for improved DME patient care.

