Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Glandular Epithelium01:20

Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Glandular Epithelium

9.0K
The glandular epithelium is made of one or more epithelial cells modified to synthesize and secrete chemical substances. Glandular epithelia can be classified based on cell number. Unicellular glands have individual secretory cells scattered across the epithelial monolayer. In contrast, multicellular glands consist of a hollow tubular duct attached to the cluster of secretory cells located in the deep pockets.
Multicellular glands are formed during early development when epithelial budding...
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Participant Heterogeneity in the Prostate Cancer Biobank of the NRG: An Obstacle to Broadening the Reach of Precision Oncology.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Interreader agreement for image quality, observation detection, and proposed AMRI-LI-RADS classification in non-contrast abbreviated MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance among early-to-mid career radiologists.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2026
Same author

Intra-alveolar Adhesive Biomaterial Preserves Ridge Height After Tooth Extraction in Dogs.

Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association·2026
Same author

Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer active surveillance: results from the Miami Active Surveillance Trial (MAST) trial.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Myosteatosis and Sarcopenic Obesity in Men Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Rationale for Mechanism-Driven Multimodal Intervention.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Phase II trial of combination radiation, hormone, and immunotherapy in grade group 5 prostate cancer.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
08:08

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: June 10, 2025

122

Classifying Malignancy in Prostate Glandular Structures from Biopsy Scans with Deep Learning.

Ryan Fogarty1,2, Dmitry Goldgof2, Lawrence Hall2

  • 1Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.

Cancers
|May 16, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A deep learning (DL) model accurately classifies prostate cancer grades from histology images, aiding pathologists. This AI tool shows promise in improving diagnostic accuracy for Gleason grading, crucial for treatment decisions.

Keywords:
Gleason cancer gradingGleason scoreISUP gradeconvolutional neural networkdeep learningpathologyprostatetransfer learninguropathologywhole-slide image

More Related Videos

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
08:40

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging

Published on: April 8, 2016

12.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
07:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

717

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
08:08

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: June 10, 2025

122
Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
08:40

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging

Published on: April 8, 2016

12.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
07:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

717

Area of Science:

  • Digital pathology
  • Computational oncology
  • Artificial intelligence in medicine

Background:

  • Histopathological classification of prostate cancer, particularly Gleason grading, is subjective and relies heavily on expert pathologists.
  • Accurate Gleason grading is critical for determining prognosis and guiding treatment strategies for prostate cancer patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for automated identification of Gleason patterns in prostate cancer histology images.
  • To assess the performance of DL models in discriminating between benign tissue, Gleason score 3 (GS3), and Gleason score 4 (GS4) prostate cancer.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a curated cohort of prostate cancer histology images, partitioned into 14,509 tiles, with expert-assigned Gleason patterns.
  • Employed transfer learning and fine-tuning of deep neural network architectures, pre-trained on ImageNet and adapted for histopathological analysis.
  • Compared various DL network architectures for their efficacy in classifying cancer grades.

Main Results:

  • The best-performing DL model achieved 91% accuracy, 0.91 F1-score, and 0.96 AUC in discriminating cancer from benign tissue (52 patients).
  • The model demonstrated moderate performance in differentiating GS3 from GS4 prostate cancer, with 68% accuracy and 0.71 AUC (40 patients).

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning models show significant potential for assisting pathologists in prostate cancer histopathological classification.
  • Further refinement of DL algorithms is needed to improve the accuracy of distinguishing between specific Gleason patterns (GS3 vs. GS4).