Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025
Study Design for Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Speech Cortical Mapping
Published on: March 24, 2023
Combined use of intraoperative MRI and awake tailored microsurgical resection to respect functional neural networks:
Constantin Tuleasca1,2,3,4, Henri-Arthur Leroy1, Ondine Strachowski1
1Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille, Roger Salengro Hospital, Neurosurgery and Neurooncology Service, Lille, France.
Introduction:
The combined use of intraoperative MRI and awake surgery is a tailored microsurgical resection to respect functional neural networks (mainly the language and motor ones). Intraoperative MRI has been classically considered to increase the extent of resection for gliomas, thereby reducing neurological deficits. Herein, we evaluated the combined technique of awake microsurgical resection and intraoperative MRI for primary brain tumours (gliomas, metastasis) and epilepsy (cortical dysplasia, non-lesional, cavernomas).
Patients And Methods:
Eighteen patients were treated with the commonly used "asleep awake asleep" (AAA) approach at Lille University Hospital, France, from November 2016 until May 2020. The exact anatomical location was insular with various extensions, frontal, temporal or fronto-temporal in 8 (44.4%), parietal in 3 (16.7%), fronto-opercular in 4 (22.2%), Rolandic in two (11.1%), and the supplementary motor area (SMA) in one (5.6%).
Results:
The patients had a mean age of 38.4 years (median 37.1, range 20.8-66.9). The mean surgical duration was 4.1 hours (median 4.2, range 2.6-6.4) with a mean duration of intraoperative MRI of 28.8 minutes (median 25, range 13-55). Overall, 61% (11/18) of patients underwent further resection, while 39% had no additional resection after intraoperative MRI. The mean preoperative and postoperative tumour volumes of the primary brain tumours were 34.7 cc (median 10.7, range 0.534-130.25) and 3.5 cc (median 0.5, range 0-17.4), respectively. Moreover, the proportion of the initially resected tumour volume at the time of intraoperative MRI (expressed as 100% from preoperative volume) and the final resected tumour volume were statistically significant (p= 0.01, Mann-Whitney test). The tumour remnants were commonly found posterior (5/9) or anterior (2/9) insular and in proximity with the motor strip (1/9) or language areas (e.g. Broca, 1/9). Further resection was not required in seven patients because there were no remnants (3/7), cortical stimulation approaching eloquent areas (3/7) and non-lesional epilepsy (1/7). The mean overall follow-up period was 15.8 months (median 12, range 3-36).
Conclusion:
The intraoperative MRI and awake microsurgical resection approach is feasible with extensive planning and multidisciplinary collaboration, as these methods are complementary and synergic rather than competitive to improve patient oncological outcomes and quality of life.
