Comparison of topographic outcomes between HPMC based and vitamin E TPGS based riboflavin solutions after corneal...

To compare the visual and topographic results between patients who underwent epithelium-off cross-linking using riboflavin solutions compounds hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) 1.1% and D-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene-glycol 1000 succinate (VE-TPGS).

In this study, 37 eyes treated with HPMC and 29 eyes treated with VE-TPGS were evaluated retrospectively. Spherical equivalent (SE), refractive cylinder, corrected distance visual acuity tests (CDVA), corneal topography indices (flat and steep meridians' keratometry (K1 and K2)), maximum keratometry (K max), central, thinnest, and apical corneal thicknesses, the front and back keratoconus vertex index (KVf, KVb), and the surface asymmetry index of the front and back surface (SIf, SIb), and endothelial cell density were compared at baseline and postoperative follow-up visits (1, 3, 6, and 12months).

At the end of the 12th-month, K1, K2, and Kmax were decreased in both groups. In comparison to baseline, there was a decline in the HPMC group in the 3rd- month Kmax change, an increase was observed in the VE-TPGS group. In the 12th-month KVb change, an increase was observed in the HPMC group compared to the baseline, while a decrease was observed in the VE-TPGS group. The other parameters did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05).

At the end of 12 months, both riboflavins were effective in stopping the progression of keratoconus and were safe for endothelium. Although both riboflavins provide a decrease in keratometry values, it can be said that VE-TPGS is superior to HPMC in correcting the ectasia on the posterior corneal surface.