Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Published on: September 13, 2015
Electrical promontory stimulation test using a portable peripheral nerve stimulator with an ear canal electrode
Michiko Kurasawa1, Takeshi Nakamura1, Akira Ganaha2
1Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Objective:
An intact cochlear nerve is necessary for successful cochlear implantation (CI). Although the promontory stimulation test (PST) using a promontory stimulator (PS) and a transtympanic needle electrode is invasive, it is still commonly used to verify cochlear nerve function. PSs are currently unavailable because they are no longer manufactured; however, considering that PST continues to be beneficial in certain situations, alternative equipment is needed. The PNS-7000® (PNS) was developed as a neurologic instrument for stimulating the peripheral nerves. This study investigated the usefulness of the ear canal stimulation test (ECST) using PNS with a silver ball ear canal electrode, which is a new noninvasive alternative technique to the PST.
Methods:
ECST was performed from November 2013 to December 2018 using PS and PNS for patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The electrical threshold, most comfortable loudness level, uncomfortable loudness level, dynamic range, and gap detection were measured in the ECST. The results of these measured PNS items were compared with PS.
Results:
ECST was performed in 61 ears of 35 patients (age, 59.9 ± 20.1 years) using PS and PNS. The sound sensation was elicited in 51 (83.6%) and 52 (85.2%) ears with PS and PNS, respectively. All items excluding GAP were measured in 46 (75%) and 43 (70%) ears at 50 and 100 Hz, respectively. GAP was measured in 33 ears by the ascending and descending methods using PS and PNS. Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient revealed a significant positive linear correlation between the PS and PNS results in all measurements. No significant difference was found between the PS and PNS thresholds in all measured items.
Conclusions:
PNS is a useful instrument for performing ECST as a new alternative to PS. ECST using a silver ball electrode is a less invasive and easier test than PST.
More Related Videos
10:08The Evoked Potential Operant Conditioning System EPOCS: A Research Tool and an Emerging Therapy for Chronic Neuromuscular Disorders
Published on: August 25, 2022
14:47Author Spotlight: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning
Published on: April 21, 2023