Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Digital Tools-Regulatory Considerations for Application in Clinical Trials.
Lian Gelis1, Isabelle Stoeckert2, Hans-Peter Podhaisky3
1Bayer AG, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals, Project Management 1, Wuppertal, Germany.
Pharmaceutical companies are using digital health technology (DHT) to enhance drug development. Harmonizing regulations between the US and EU can accelerate the adoption of these innovative digital tools in clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical industry
- Digital health technology (DHT)
- Regulatory science
Background:
- The pharmaceutical sector increasingly adopts digital health technology (DHT) for drug development and commercialization.
- Regulatory bodies like the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) support technological advancements.
- Differing regulatory landscapes, such as the US Cures Act and the EU's Medical Device Regulation, present unique challenges and opportunities for digital health innovation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the regulatory frameworks of the FDA and EMA concerning digital tools in clinical drug development.
- To propose strategic approaches for global pharmaceutical companies navigating these regulations.
- To identify pathways for ensuring digital tools meet safety, performance, and data integrity standards.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of the US FDA and EU EMA regulatory requirements for digital health technology.
- Evaluation of validation and qualification processes for digital tools in drug development.
- Assessment of GxP, data privacy, and cybersecurity compliance for DHTs.
Main Results:
- Digital tools must be fit-for-purpose, meeting basic safety and performance requirements regardless of Medical Device status.
- Both regions require adherence to quality systems, surveillance, GxP, data privacy, and cybersecurity regulations.
- There is an overlap in technical and clinical validation, crucial for qualifying drug development tools and ensuring reliable data.
Conclusions:
- Pharmaceutical companies should consider using approved solutions or qualifying drug development tools early and in parallel with clinical development.
- Early engagement with regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA/CA) is recommended to define evidentiary standards and regulatory pathways.
- Harmonization of disparate US and EU regulations and further development of the EU landscape could significantly boost the use of digital tools in clinical trials.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Drug Regulation
Preclinical Development: Overview
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...

