Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

120
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
120
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

44.5K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.5K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

45.2K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.2K
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

96
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
96
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A systematic map of methods for assessing societal benefits of Earth science information.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Pesticides and habitat loss additively reduce wild bees in crop fields.

Nature ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

The EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy, sustainable, and just food systems.

Lancet (London, England)·2025
Same author

Critical habitat thresholds for effective pollinator conservation in agricultural landscapes.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Arbuscular mycorrhizal interactions and nutrient supply mediate floral trait variation and pollinator visitation.

The New phytologist·2024
Same author

A cautious approach to subsidies for environmental sustainability.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2024
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 30, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

777

How does framing influence preference for multiple solutions to societal problems?

James Shyan-Tau Wu1, Claire Kremen1,2,3, Jiaying Zhao1,4

  • 1Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Plos One
|May 17, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Framing environmental and social problems did not influence preference for multiple solutions. Perceived problem severity and urgency, and reduced dichotomous thinking, were key to adopting multi-solution approaches.

More Related Videos

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 30, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

777
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Environmental and social problems often require multifaceted solutions, yet are frequently framed dichotomously.
  • Dichotomous framing can hinder the adoption of necessary multiple solutions for complex issues.
  • Understanding how framing influences the preference for multiple solutions is crucial for effective problem-solving.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether framing environmental and social problems influences individuals' preference for multiple solutions.
  • To examine the impact of problem framing (multiple causes, impacts, or solutions) on solution preference.
  • To explore the relationship between framing, perceived problem severity, urgency, and dichotomous thinking.

Main Methods:

  • A pre-registered experiment with 1,432 participants randomly assigned to one of four framing conditions (multiple causes, multiple impacts, multiple solutions, or control).
  • Participants evaluated problems presented with different frames and reported their preferred solution, perceived problem severity and urgency, and dichotomous thinking tendency.
  • Statistical analyses, including pre-registered and exploratory analyses, were conducted to assess the impact of framing and related variables.

Main Results:

  • No significant impact of the framing conditions on preference for multiple solutions, perceived severity, perceived urgency, or dichotomous thinking was found in pre-registered analyses.
  • Exploratory analyses revealed positive correlations between perceived problem severity/urgency and preference for multiple solutions.
  • Dichotomous thinking was negatively correlated with the preference for multiple solutions.

Conclusions:

  • Framing problems with multiple causes, impacts, or solutions did not demonstrably increase the preference for multiple solutions.
  • Interventions aimed at increasing the perceived severity and urgency of environmental and social problems may encourage multi-solution adoption.
  • Reducing dichotomous thinking is a potential strategy to foster greater acceptance of multiple solutions for complex challenges.