Dissecting sources of variability in patient response to targeted therapy: anti-HER2 therapies as a case study
1Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Background And Purpose:
Despite their use to treat cancers with specific genetic aberrations, targeted therapies elicit heterogeneous responses. Sources of variability are critical to targeted therapy drug development, yet there exists no method to discern their relative contribution to response heterogeneity.
Experimental Approach:
We use HER2-amplified breast cancer and two agents, neratinib and lapatinib, to develop a platform for dissecting sources of variability in patient response. The platform comprises four components: pharmacokinetics, tumor burden and growth kinetics, clonal composition, and sensitivity to treatment. Pharmacokinetics are simulated using population models to capture variable systemic exposure. Tumor burden and growth kinetics are derived from clinical data comprising over 800,000 women. The fraction of sensitive and resistant tumor cells is informed by HER2 immunohistochemistry. Growth rate-corrected drug potency is used to predict response. We integrate these factors and simulate clinical outcomes for virtual patients. The relative contributions of these factors to response heterogeneity arecompared.
Key Results:
The platform was verified with clinical data, including response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). For both neratinib and lapatinib, the growth rate of resistant clones influenced PFS to a higher degree than systemic drug exposure. Variability in exposure at labeled doses did not significantly influence response. Sensitivity to drug strongly influenced responses to neratinib. Variability in patient HER2 immunohistochemistry scores influenced responses to lapatinib. Exploratory twice daily dosing improved PFS for neratinib but not lapatinib.
Conclusion And Implications:
The platform can dissect sources of variability in response to target therapy, which may facilitate decision-making during drug development.
Insights
A new platform dissects variability in targeted cancer therapy response. Tumor growth and drug sensitivity, not drug exposure, significantly impact progression-free survival in HER2-amplified breast cancer. This aids targeted therapy drug development.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Targeted therapies show variable patient responses despite targeting specific genetic aberrations.
- Understanding sources of response heterogeneity is crucial for advancing targeted therapy drug development.
- No current methods effectively quantify the contribution of different factors to treatment response variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a computational platform for dissecting sources of variability in patient response to targeted therapies.
- To compare the relative contributions of pharmacokinetics, tumor characteristics, and drug sensitivity to response heterogeneity.
- To apply the platform to HER2-amplified breast cancer treated with neratinib and lapatinib.
Main Methods:
- Developed a simulation platform integrating pharmacokinetics, tumor burden/growth kinetics, clonal composition, and drug sensitivity.
- Utilized population pharmacokinetic models for systemic exposure variability.
- Incorporated clinical data for tumor growth kinetics and HER2 immunohistochemistry for sensitive/resistant cell fractions.
- Predicted response using growth rate-corrected drug potency and simulated virtual patient outcomes.
Main Results:
- The platform accurately predicted clinical outcomes, including response rate and progression-free survival (PFS).
- Resistant clone growth rate significantly impacted PFS more than systemic drug exposure for both neratinib and lapatinib.
- Drug sensitivity strongly influenced neratinib response, while HER2 immunohistochemistry variability affected lapatinib response.
Conclusions:
- The developed platform effectively dissects sources of variability in targeted therapy response.
- This approach can aid decision-making processes in targeted therapy drug development.
- Identifying key variability drivers can optimize treatment strategies and drug design.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Patient-Related Factors
Age stands as a key determinant in protein-drug binding. Neonates, characterized by low albumin content, experience heightened concentrations of unbound drugs such as phenytoin and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...


